Foster-Henry, et al., v Army and Air Force Exchange Service, et al.

Filing 8

ORDER Granting 7 Stipulation to Extend Time re 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . ( Responses due by 8/11/2017.) Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5

Amanda M. Roberts, Esq.
State Bar of Nevada No. 9294
ROBERTS STOFFEL FAMILY LAW GROUP
4411 S. Pecos Road
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
PH: [phone]
FAX [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

BERYL NICOLE FOSTER-HENRY, an
individual; and DEONNE HENRY, an
individual,

)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
ARMY AND AIR FORCE EXCHANGE
)
SERVICE, ANDREWS AND COMPANY,
)
LLC, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE;
)
UNITED STATE OF AMERICAN EX REL )
NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE, UNITED
)
STATE OF AMERICA EX REL
)
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,
)
NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE EXCHANGE; )
ARMY AND AIR FORCE EXCHANGES
)
SERVICES; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. )
)
Defendants.
)

Case No: 2:17-cv-01437

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO ENLARGE PLAINTIFF’S
TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a Response to Defendant

22
Andrews and Company, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss shall be extended from August 3, 2017 until
23
24
25
26

August 11, 2017;
IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED that this extension of time is being agreed
upon in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

27
28

Page 1 of 2

1

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED that Plaintiffs need additional time because

2

other named Defendants, who have been served but who have not yet appeared in their case,

3
4

possess information regarding their relationship with Defendant Andrews and Company, LLC
which is relevant, and potentially dispositive, on the issues raised in Defendant Andrews and

5
Company, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss. As such, additional time is needed for the Plaintiffs to
6
7
8

ascertain whether a Response to Defendant Andrews and Company, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss is
warranted or whether Plaintiffs will stipulate to voluntarily dismiss Defendant Andrews and

9

Company from this action. The additional Defendants are Army and Air Force Exchange Service,

10

Andrews And Company, LLC, Department Of Defense; United State Of American Ex Rel Nellis

11

Air Force Base, United State Of America Ex Rel Department Of The Air Force, Nellis Air Force

12

Base Exchange; Army And Air Force Exchanges Services; Department Of Defense.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Dated this ____ Day of August, 2017
3rd

Dated this ____ Day of August, 2017
3rd

ROBERTS STOFFEL FAMILY
LAW GROUP

RAY LEGO AND ASSOCIATES

By:__________________________
/s/Amanda Roberts, Esq.
Amanda M. Roberts, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No.: 9492
4411 So. Pecos Road
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
Attorney for Plaintiffs

By: ________________________________
/s/ Jennifer Mullin Higgins, Esq.
Jennifer Mullin Higgins, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No.: 7107
7450 Arroyo Crossing Parkway, Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113
Attorney for Defendants

20

ORDER

21

BASED ON THE STIPULATIONS of the parties herein,

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

10th
Dated this __ day of August, 2017,

24
25

___________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26
27
28

Page 2 of 2