First 100, LLC v. CENLAR, FSB et al

Filing 156

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties' joint pretrial order is due on or before Wednesday, April 6, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties' request for a pretrial conference is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 3/7/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4

***

5

First 100, LLC,

6

Case No. 2:17-cv-01438-JCM-DJA
Plaintiff,

7

v.

8

Order

Cenlar, FSB, et al.,

9

Defendants.

10

This is a quiet title action arising out of real property located in Las Vegas, Nevada. The

11
12

Honorable District Judge James C. Mahan ordered the parties to file a joint status report. (ECF

13

No. 148). In their status report, the parties explained that discovery dates had expired and asked

14

the Court to set a scheduling conference or enter a scheduling order to set deadlines applicable to

15

the appearing parties. (ECF No. 153). 1 Because the joint status report did not explain the status

16

of discovery or respective needs of the parties, the undersigned ordered the parties to instead

17

stipulate to a proposed scheduling order. (ECF No. 154). The parties then filed another joint

18

status report, explaining that they would not need to reopen discovery. (ECF No. 155). Instead,

19

the parties requested a trial date and asked, “that the Court set a Pretrial Conference on a date

20

convenient to the Court in advance of the selected trial date.” (Id.).
Because the parties are requesting to move forward with trial, they will need to submit a

21
22

joint pretrial order. See LR 16-4; see LR 26-1(b)(5). The Court thus orders the parties to submit

23

their joint pretrial order by Wednesday, April 6, 2022. However, the Court denies the parties

24

request for a pretrial conference without prejudice. The parties have not outlined what topics they

25

wish to address at the conference or whether briefing will be necessary. The Court does not

26
27
28

1

The parties first joint status report is filed as ECF No. 151. The parties filed their amended
status report one day later at ECF No. 153.

1

typically conduct pretrial conferences without a written request, and this information is vital to

2

the undersigned’s ability to schedule and conduct this conference. 2 See LR 16-2. The parties

3

may move or stipulate to a pretrial conference if, after they file their joint pretrial order,

4

outstanding issues remain which they would like to address with the undersigned at a pretrial

5

conference.

6
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties’ joint pretrial order is due on or before

7
8

Wednesday, April 6, 2022.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ request for a pretrial conference is denied

9
10

without prejudice.

11
DATED: March 7, 2022

12
13

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

It is unclear from the parties’ request whether they are seeking to schedule a calendar call or
pretrial conference. To the extent the parties are seeking to schedule a calendar call, that request
should be included in their pretrial order. See LR 16-4.
Page 2 of 2