Payan v. Sallie Mae, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 1 Complaint (First Request). Webbank answer due 7/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC Taylor Anello 2 Nevada Bar No. 12881 Email: tanello@dickinson-wright.com 3 8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210 4 Tel: (702) 550-4400 Attorneys for Defendant WebBank dba 5 Fingerhut/Webbank 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 ANA M. PAYAN, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case Number: 2:17-cv-01460-RFB-VCF Plaintiff, v. STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT WEBBANK DBA FINGERHUT/WEBBANK TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT SALLIE MAE, INC.; STATE FARM BANK, FSB d/b/a STATE FARM FINANCIAL SERVICES; GINNY’S, INC; MIDLAND MORTGAGE; WEBBANK D/B/A FINGERHUT/WEBBANK; TRANS UNION LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC; and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned, counsel of record for 22 Plaintiff Ana M. Payan (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WebBank dba Fingerhut/WebBank 23 (“WebBank”) (collectively as the “Parties”), that the Parties consent to extend the deadline for 24 25 26 27 WebBank’s response to Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Complaint”). This is WebBank’s first stipulation for an extension of time to file a response to the Complaint filed with this court. The extension is requested in order to provide WebBank’s counsel time to gather information and documentation 28 1 1 necessary to adequately analyze the claims set forth in the Complaint. The Parties agree that 2 WebBank shall respond to the Complaint on or before July 11, 2017. 3 4 Dated this 29 day of June, 2017 5 Dated this 29 day of June, 2017 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC 6 7 By_/s/ Matthew Knepper_______ Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 8 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 9 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 10 Las Vegas, NV 89129 Phone: (702) 825-6060 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 By: /s/ Taylor Anello________________ Taylor Anello, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12881 DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC 8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210 Attorneys for Defendant Webbank dba Fingerhut/Webbank 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 _________________________________ 18 CAM FERENBACH 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 June DATED this 29th day of _________ 2017. _____ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case 2:17-cv-01460-RFB-VCF Document 21 Filed 06/29/17 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned, an employee of Dickinson Wright PLLC, hereby certifies that on the 29 4 day of June 2017, a copy of STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR 5 DEFENDANT WEBBANK DBA FINGERHUT/WEBBANK TO RESPOND TO 6 PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) was served electronically to all parties of 7 interest through the Court's CM/ECF system as follows: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 Phone: (702) 825-6060 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jason Revzin Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP 6385 S. Rainbow Blvd. Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89118 Attorneys for Trans Union, LLC David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 Phone: (702) 880-5554 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jennifer L Braster Naylor & Braster 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Bradley T Austin Snell & Wilmer LLP 3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC 21 22 /s/Angelica V Jimenez An employee of Dickinson Wright PLLC 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?