Matlean v. Dzurenda et al
Filing
50
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice against the remaining Defendants in accordance with Rule 41. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/27/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
Case 2:17-cv-01461-KJD-DJA Document 50 Filed 10/27/20 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
JAMES KW MATLEAN,
Case No. 2:17-cv-01461-KJD-DJA
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES DZURENDA, Director NDOC, et al.,
11
12
ORDER
Defendants.
The Court granted summary judgment for all Defendants except Jo Gentry, Warden
13
SDCC, Dr. Koehn, Dr. Vicuna, and SL Clark on September 27, 2019. Following entry of
14
separate judgment on the dismissed defendants on September 30, 2019, no party has taken any
15
action of record. On August 27, 2020, the Clerk of the Court notified (#49) Plaintiff that no
16
action of record had been taken for longer than 270 days and that unless Plaintiff took action, the
17
Court would dismiss his complaint for want of prosecution in accordance with Local Rule 41-1.
18
Neither party responded to the Clerkâs notice. Therefore, in accordance with Federal Rule of
19
Civil Procedure 41 (a) and LR 41-1 and good cause being found, the Court dismisses this action
20
for want of prosecution.
21
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with
prejudice against the remaining Defendants in accordance with Rule 41;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for the
24
remaining Defendants and against Plaintiff.
25
Dated this 27th day of October 2020.
26
27
28
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?