Martin-Quigley v. Berryhill
ORDER that the 21 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. A.Q.'s 15 Motion for Reversal and Remand is GRANTED IN PART. The matter is remanded for the ALJ to properly evaluate the opinions of Dr. Weber, Dr. Minuskin, and Dr. Hall and to obtain new relevant evidence to determine whether A.Q. has been disabled since 3/22/2011. The Commissioners 17 Cross-Motion to Affirm is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No. 2:17-cv-01464-RFB-VCF
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, et al.,
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) of the
Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered February 1, 2018.
A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific
written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is
required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed
findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local
Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct
“any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due
by February 15, 2018. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this
case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that A.Q.’s Motion for Reversal and Remand (ECF No.
15) is GRANTED IN PART. The matter is remanded for the ALJ to properly evaluate the opinions
of Dr. Weber, Dr. Minuskin, and Dr. Hall and to obtain new relevant evidence to determine
whether A.Q. has been disabled since March 22, 2011.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF
No. 17) is DENIED.
DATED: April 16, 2018.
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?