Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mahogany Meadows Avenue Trust et al

Filing 12

ORDER Granting 11 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 9 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 7/26/2017. Replies due by 8/2/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Case 2:17-cv-01469-JCM-VCF Document 11 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Michael Paretti, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13926
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702-784-5252
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10

Snell & Wilmer

L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200

11
12

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national
banking association,
Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.

15

MAHOGANY MEADOWS AVENUE
TRUST; COPPER CREEK HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation; HAMPTON & HAMPTON
COLLECTIONS, LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company;

16
17
18

Case No. 2:17-cv-01469-JCM-VCF

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
MAHOGANY MEADOWS AVENUE
TRUST’S MOTION TO DISMISS
(FIRST REQUEST)

Defendants.

19
20

Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and Defendant Mahogany Meadows

21

Avenue Trust (“Mahogany Meadows”), by and through their respective counsel (collectively the

22

“Parties”), for good cause shown, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension for Wells Fargo to

23

respond to Mahogany Meadows’ Motion to Dismiss filed on June 14, 2017 [Doc. No. 9]. Wells

24

Fargo’s response to the Motion to Dismiss is currently due June 28, 2017. The Parties request the

25

Court extend Wells Fargo’s deadline to July 26, 2017. This is the Parties’ first extension request.

26
27
28

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) and Local Rule 6-1, there exists good
cause to grant this extension to respond for the following reasons:

Case 2:17-cv-01469-JCM-VCF Document 11 Filed 06/21/17 Page 2 of 2

1

1.

This extension is sought both because Wells Fargo and its counsel require

2

additional time to meaningfully prepare the response to the Motion to Dismiss in light of recent

3

developments in the law, and because counsel for Wells Fargo, Kelly Dove, has a prepaid

4

international trip planned during the time the response would be due in the ordinary course.

5

2.

On June 19, 2017, the Parties agreed to the extension requested herein.

6

3.

This stipulated extension request is sought in good faith and is not made for the

7

purpose of delay.

8
9

Therefore, the Parties jointly agree for an extension to July 26, 2017 for Wells Fargo to
respond to Mahogany Meadows’ Motion to Dismiss.

Snell & Wilmer

Dated: June 21, 2017

Dated: June 21, 2017

11
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200

10

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL F. BOHN,
ESQ., LTD.

12
13
14
15
16
17

By: /s/ Michael Paretti
Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Michael Paretti, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13926
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

18
19

By: /s/ Michael F. Bohn
Michael F. Bohn, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 1641
Adam R. Trippiedi, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12294
376 East Warm Springs Road, Ste. 140
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Attorneys for Defendant
Mahogany Meadows Avenue Trust

ORDER

20

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has up to and including July 26,

21

2017 to file its response to Mahogany Meadows Avenue Trust’s Motion to Dismiss, and

22

Mahogany Meadows Avenue Trust shall have up to and including August 2, 2017 to file its reply

23

in support of its Motion to Dismiss.

24

June 22, 2017.
DATED this ____ day of _______________ 2017.

25

_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26
4829-9880-0970

27
28
-2-