Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mahogany Meadows Avenue Trust et al

Filing 16

ORDER Granting 15 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 13 First MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Responses due by 8/2/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Case 2:17-cv-01469-JCM-VCF Document 15 Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Michael Paretti, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13926
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702-784-5252
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10

Snell & Wilmer

L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200

11
12

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national
banking association,
Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.

15

MAHOGANY MEADOWS AVENUE
TRUST; COPPER CREEK HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation; HAMPTON & HAMPTON
COLLECTIONS, LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company;

16
17
18

Case No. 2:17-cv-01469-JCM-VCF

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
COPPER CREEK HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION’S MOTION TO
DISMISS
(FIRST REQUEST)

Defendants.

19
20

Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and Defendant Copper Creek

21

Homeowners Association (“Copper Creek”), by and through their respective counsel (collectively

22

the “Parties”), for good cause shown, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension for Wells Fargo

23

to respond to Copper Creek’s Motion to Dismiss filed on June 29, 2017 [Doc. No. 13]. Wells

24

Fargo’s response to the Motion to Dismiss is currently due July 13, 2017. The Parties request the

25

Court extend Wells Fargo’s deadline to July 26, 2017. This is the Parties’ first extension request.

26
27
28

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) and Local Rule 6-1, there exists good
cause to grant this extension to respond for the following reasons:

Case 2:17-cv-01469-JCM-VCF Document 15 Filed 07/10/17 Page 2 of 2

1

1.

This extension is sought both because Wells Fargo and its counsel require

2

additional time to meaningfully prepare the response to the Motion to Dismiss in light of recent

3

developments in the law, as well as to consider potential early resolution options.

4

2.

On July 10, 2017, the Parties agreed to the extension requested herein.

5

3.

This stipulated extension request is sought in good faith and is not made for the

6

purpose of delay.

7

Therefore, the Parties jointly agree for an extension to July 26, 2017 for Wells Fargo to

8

respond to Copper Creek’s Motion to Dismiss.

9

Dated: July 10, 2017

Dated: July 10, 2017

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

LIPSON, NEILSON, COLE, SELTZER &
GARIN, P.C.

10

Snell & Wilmer

L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200

11
12
13
14
15
16

By: /s/ Michael Paretti
Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Michael Paretti, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13926
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

17
18

By: /s/ Amber Williams
J. William Ebert, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 2697
Amber M. Williams, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12301
9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Attorneys for Defendant
Copper Creek Homeowners’ Association

ORDER

19

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has up to and including July 26,

20

2017 to file its response to Copper Creek’s Motion to Dismiss, and Copper Creek shall have up to

21

and including August 2, 2017 to file its reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss.

22

July 13, day of
DATED this ____ 2017. _______________ 2017.

23

_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

24
4829-9880-0970

25
26
27
28
-2-