Bagdasarian v. Ford Motor Credit Co. et al

Filing 7

ORDER Granting 6 Stipulation to Extend Deadline. Wells Fargo Card Services answer due 7/19/2017; Wells Fargo Dealer Services answer due 7/19/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/2/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kelly H. Dove, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10569 Tanya N. Lewis, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8855 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 kdove@swlaw.com tlewis@swlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Dealer Services and Wells Fargo Card Services) 9 10 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ZACHARY J. P. BAGDASARIAN, Case No. 2:17-cv-01481-RFB-VCF Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO.; VW CREDIT INC.; WELLS FARGO DEALER SERVICES; KAY JEWELERS; WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICES; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; TRANS UNION, LLC, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784.5200 11 15 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FIRST REQUEST 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Zachary J.P. Bagdasarian (“Plaintiff”), through his attorneys, Haines & Krieger, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Dealer Services and Wells Fargo Card Services (“Wells Fargo”), through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows: Plaintiff filed his Complaint on May 24, 2017 [Docket No. 1]. In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, Wells Fargo requests, and Plaintiff agrees, that Wells Fargo shall have until July 19, 2017, to file its responsive pleading. This is the parties’ first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so that the parties may discuss settlement. 1 Dated June 2, 2017 2 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 3 By: /s/ David Krieger David H. Krieger, Esq. HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 (signed with permission) By: /s/ Tanya N. Lewis Kelly H. Dove, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10569 Tanya N. Lewis, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8855 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Dealer Services and Wells Fargo Card Services) 4 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Zachary J.P. Bagdasarian 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784.5200 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended to on or before July 19, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 June DATED ______ 2 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 11 Snell & Wilmer Respectfully submitted by: 10 L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784.5200 9 /s/ Tanya N. Lewis Tanya N. Lewis, Esq. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- , 2017. 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 4 5 On June 2, 2017, I served the foregoing document on all parties appearing in this case when filing said document through the court’s PACER system with automatic e-service on all persons who have registered for e-service on PACER for this case. 6 /s/ Nissa Riley An Employee of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 7 8 4815-4653-5754 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784.5200 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?