U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
80
ORDER Granting 77 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 72 Order (Fifth Request). See Order for deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Robin E. Perkins, Esq. (NV Bar No. 9891)
Tanya N. Lewis, Esq. (NV Bar No. 8855)
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: (702) 784-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
Email: rperkins@swlaw.com
tlewis@swlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
U.S. Bank National Association
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
12
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston
Mortgage Securities Corp., CSFB Mortgage
Pass-Thru Certificates, Series 2005-5,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:17-cv-01485-JCM-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
vs.
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a
Nevada limited-liability company;
SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation; ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC, a
Nevada limited-liability company,
(FIFTH REQUEST)
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AND ALL RELATED ACTIONS
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rules 6-1, 26-1 and 26-4, U.S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities
Corp., CSFB Mortgage Pass-Thru Certificates, Series 2005-5 (“U.S. Bank”), Mortgage Electronic
Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) (collectively,
-1-
1
the “Stipulating Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, submit
2
this Stipulation and Proposed Order to extend the dispositive motion briefing deadlines in this
3
action. This is the Stipulating Parties’ fifth request for extension of dispositive motion deadlines,
4
but only the second request to extend since the filing of the dispositive motions1.
5
The parties filed their Motions for Summary Judgment on October 12, 2018, and filed
6
their respective Responses on or before November 21, 2018, per the operative deadlines. The
7
current deadline to file the Reply briefs is December 21, 2018; the parties seek an extension to
8
January 18, 2019. The parties are now actively engaging in settlement discussions; both parties
9
have made settlement offers and are negotiating.
Snell & Wilmer
This request to extend the deadlines is made in good faith, and is not for purpose of delay
11
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
10
or prejudice to any party, but to allow all parties to have enough time to fully brief their
12
dispositive motions and also focus significant efforts on a possible settlement. Pursuant to LR 26-
13
4, good cause exists to grant this request within 21 days of the Reply deadline, as the parties only
14
recently began case resolution discussions this week and are in active negotiations now.
15
The requested extension will not result in undue delay or prejudice to any party, as the
16
parties previously stated in their Joint Interim Status Report [Docket No. 33] that their earliest
17
available date for trial for this matter is April 29, 2019.
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
28
1
The first request to extend the dispositive motion deadline was contained in the stipulation and
order to extend discovery [Docket No. 36], entered by this Court on April 3, 2018, and the second
request to extend was entered as an order of this Court on June 12, 2018 [Docket No. 62]. The
third request to extend was entered as an order of this Court on August 17, 2018 [Docket No. 68].
The fourth request to extend was entered as an order of this Court on November 8, 2018 [Docket
No. 72.]
-2-
1
A. Proposed Schedule for Dispositive Motions
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
EVENT
Dispositive motions
Response to dispositive
motions
Reply brief in support of
dispositive motion
Pre-trial order and FRCP
26(a)(3) disclosures
EXISTING DEADLINE
NEW DEADLINE
October 12, 2018
November 21, 2018
Closed
Closed
December 21, 2018
January 18, 2019
30 days after decision on any 30 days after decision on the
dispositive motion.
dispositive motions.
Dated this 6th day of December, 2018
Dated this 6th day of December, 2018
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
KIM GILBERT EBRON
/s/ Tanya N. Lewis
Robin E. Perkins, Esq.(NV Bar No. 9891)
Tanya N. Lewis, Esq. (NV Bar No. 8855)
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Plaintiff U.S. Bank
National Association
/s/ Diana S. Ebron
Diana S. Ebron, Esq. (NV Bar 10580)
Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Esq. (NV Bar 10593)
Karen L. Hanks, Esq. (NV Bar 9578)
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139-5974
(signature affixed with permission)
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Attorneys for Defendant SFR Investments
Pool 1, LLC
ORDER
18
IT IS SO ORDERED:
19
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
December 13, 2018
DATED:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically transmitted the foregoing
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING
4
SCHEDULE with the Clerk of Court for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada by using the
5
CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to all counsel in this
6
matter; all counsel being registered to receive Electronic Filing.
7
DATED: December 6, 2018
8
9
/s/ Susan Ballif
An employee of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
4829-5943-6930
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?