U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 80

ORDER Granting 77 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 72 Order (Fifth Request). See Order for deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Robin E. Perkins, Esq. (NV Bar No. 9891) Tanya N. Lewis, Esq. (NV Bar No. 8855) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 Email: rperkins@swlaw.com tlewis@swlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 11 12 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CSFB Mortgage Pass-Thru Certificates, Series 2005-5, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:17-cv-01485-JCM-PAL STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE vs. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company; SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit corporation; ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company, (FIFTH REQUEST) Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AND ALL RELATED ACTIONS STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rules 6-1, 26-1 and 26-4, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CSFB Mortgage Pass-Thru Certificates, Series 2005-5 (“U.S. Bank”), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) (collectively, -1- 1 the “Stipulating Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, submit 2 this Stipulation and Proposed Order to extend the dispositive motion briefing deadlines in this 3 action. This is the Stipulating Parties’ fifth request for extension of dispositive motion deadlines, 4 but only the second request to extend since the filing of the dispositive motions1. 5 The parties filed their Motions for Summary Judgment on October 12, 2018, and filed 6 their respective Responses on or before November 21, 2018, per the operative deadlines. The 7 current deadline to file the Reply briefs is December 21, 2018; the parties seek an extension to 8 January 18, 2019. The parties are now actively engaging in settlement discussions; both parties 9 have made settlement offers and are negotiating. Snell & Wilmer This request to extend the deadlines is made in good faith, and is not for purpose of delay 11 L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 10 or prejudice to any party, but to allow all parties to have enough time to fully brief their 12 dispositive motions and also focus significant efforts on a possible settlement. Pursuant to LR 26- 13 4, good cause exists to grant this request within 21 days of the Reply deadline, as the parties only 14 recently began case resolution discussions this week and are in active negotiations now. 15 The requested extension will not result in undue delay or prejudice to any party, as the 16 parties previously stated in their Joint Interim Status Report [Docket No. 33] that their earliest 17 available date for trial for this matter is April 29, 2019. 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 26 27 28 1 The first request to extend the dispositive motion deadline was contained in the stipulation and order to extend discovery [Docket No. 36], entered by this Court on April 3, 2018, and the second request to extend was entered as an order of this Court on June 12, 2018 [Docket No. 62]. The third request to extend was entered as an order of this Court on August 17, 2018 [Docket No. 68]. The fourth request to extend was entered as an order of this Court on November 8, 2018 [Docket No. 72.] -2- 1 A. Proposed Schedule for Dispositive Motions 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EVENT Dispositive motions Response to dispositive motions Reply brief in support of dispositive motion Pre-trial order and FRCP 26(a)(3) disclosures EXISTING DEADLINE NEW DEADLINE October 12, 2018 November 21, 2018 Closed Closed December 21, 2018 January 18, 2019 30 days after decision on any 30 days after decision on the dispositive motion. dispositive motions. Dated this 6th day of December, 2018 Dated this 6th day of December, 2018 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. KIM GILBERT EBRON /s/ Tanya N. Lewis Robin E. Perkins, Esq.(NV Bar No. 9891) Tanya N. Lewis, Esq. (NV Bar No. 8855) 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association /s/ Diana S. Ebron Diana S. Ebron, Esq. (NV Bar 10580) Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Esq. (NV Bar 10593) Karen L. Hanks, Esq. (NV Bar 9578) 7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89139-5974 (signature affixed with permission) 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ORDER 18 IT IS SO ORDERED: 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE December 13, 2018 DATED: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically transmitted the foregoing 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING 4 SCHEDULE with the Clerk of Court for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada by using the 5 CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to all counsel in this 6 matter; all counsel being registered to receive Electronic Filing. 7 DATED: December 6, 2018 8 9 /s/ Susan Ballif An employee of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 11 4829-5943-6930 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?