Collier v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 19

ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Amend Pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-01486-APG-PAL Document 18 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982 Andrew J. Sharples Nevada Bar No. 12866 NAYLOR & BRASTER 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 (T) (702) 420-7000 (F) (702) 420-7001 jbraster@naylorandbrasterlaw.com asharples@naylorandbrasterlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 DRAKE COLLIER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NAYLOR & BRASTER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 (702) 420-7000 [First Request] Defendants. 17 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and TRANS UNION, LLC, 16 18 Case No. 2:17-cv-01486-APG-PAL Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, Plaintiff, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), and Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the motion to amend deadline by fifty (50) days. At this time, the parties are not seeking an extension of any other discovery deadlines but reserve the right to request in the future. In support of this Stipulation and Request, the parties state as follows: I. DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE 1. Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on May 25, 2017. 2. On June 21, 2017, Experian filed its answer. 3. On June 29, 2017, Plaintiff and Experian held the Rule 26 conference. 4. On July 5, 2017, Trans Union filed its answer. Case 2:17-cv-01486-APG-PAL Document 18 Filed 08/03/17 Page 2 of 4 1 2 5. On June 29, 2017, Plaintiff served Experian with requests for admission, requests for production of documents, and interrogatories. 3 6. On June 23, 2017, Plaintiff served Experian with a notice of deposition, setting the 4 deposition of Experian’s 30(b)(6) designee for August 8, 2017. Experian’s witness is not available 5 on August 8, 2017, but is available on September 20, 2017. Plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to this 6 date provided the parties stipulate to the extension of the motion to amend deadline until 50 days 7 after the renoticed deposition date and Plaintiff’s deposition occurs after Experian’s deposition. 8 7. On July 13, 2017, the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order was entered. 9 8. On July 18, 2017, the Stipulated Protective Order was entered. 10 9. On July 13, 2017, Trans Union and Experian served their initial disclosures. 11 10. On July 14, 2017, Plaintiff served his initial disclosures. 12 B. 13 14 1. The deposition of Experian’s 30(b)(6) witness, which Plaintiff has agreed to renotice for September 20, 2017; 15 16 Specific Description of Discovery that Remains to be Completed 2. The deposition of Plaintiff, which Experian has agreed to renotice for a date after Experian’s rescheduled deposition; 17 3. Depositions of remaining parties and witnesses; and, 18 4. Any necessary additional written discovery. 19 C. Reasons Why the Remaining Discovery Was Not Completed 20 The parties aver, pursuant to LR 6-1, that good cause exists for the requested extension. 21 At this juncture, the discovery close is December 18, 2017. This stipulation to extend the discovery 22 deadlines is made well in advance of the applicable discovery deadlines and is made to 23 accommodate the availability of Experian’s 30(b)(6) designee on September 20, 2017, and 24 Plaintiff’s request, and the parties’ agreement, to extend the motion to amend pleadings deadline 25 such that the motion to amend pleadings deadline will now be approximately fifty (50) days after 26 Experian’s rescheduled deposition, or November 9, 2017. At this time, the parties do not request 27 an extension of any other discovery deadlines, but only an extension of the motion to amend 28 NAYLOR & BRASTER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 (702) 420-7000 2 of 4 Case 2:17-cv-01486-APG-PAL Document 18 Filed 08/03/17 Page 3 of 4 1 2 deadline. The parties reserve the right to seek an extension of other deadlines in the future. D. Proposed Discovery Deadlines 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Event Close of Discovery Current Deadline December 18, 2017 Proposed New Deadline Same Deadline to Amend Pleadings September 19, 2017 November 9, 2017 Deadline to Disclose Initial Experts October 19, 2017 Same Deadline to Disclose Rebuttal Experts November 20, 2017 Same 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NAYLOR & BRASTER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 (702) 420-7000 3 of 4 Case 2:17-cv-01486-APG-PAL Document 18 Filed 08/03/17 Page 4 of 4 1 2 Dispositive Motions January 18, 2018 Same Pre-Trial Order February 19, 2018 Same 3 Dated: August 3, 2017 4 NAYLOR & BRASTER KNEPPER & CLARK, LLC By: /s/ Jennifer L. Braster Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 By: /s/ Miles N. Clark Matthew I. Knepper (NBN 12796) Miles N. Clark (NBN 13848) 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 5 6 7 8 9 10 David H. Krieger Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 11 12 13 14 15 By: /s/ Jason Revzin Jason G. Revzin Nevada Bar No. 8629 6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89118 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Trans Union LLC 16 ORDER 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: August 7, 2017 20 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NAYLOR & BRASTER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 (702) 420-7000 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?