Robinson v. MV Transportation, Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER Granting 24 Stipulation Dismissing Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action with Prejudice and Vacating Briefing Schedule. FURTHER ORDERED that 22 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 Janice M. Michaels Nevada Bar No. 6062 2 jmichaels@wshblaw.com Brooke A. Bohlke 3 Nevada Bar No. 9374 bbohlke@wshblaw.com 4 Analise N. Martinez Nevada Bar No. 13185 5 amartinez@wshblaw.com Nevada Bar No. 13185 6 Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP 7674 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Suite 150 7 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128-6644 Telephone: 702 251 4100 8 Facsimile: 702 251 5405 Attorneys at Law 7674 WEST LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD, SUITE 150 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89128-6644 TELEPHONE 702 251 4100 ♦ FAX 702 251 5405 WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP 9 Attorneys for Defendant, MV TRANSPORTATION, INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 TONIE ROBINSON, individually, Case No. 2:17-cv-01491-RFB-PAL 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.; DOE BUS OPERATOR; DOE BUS DRIVER; DOES I18 X, and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive, 19 Trial Date: None Set Defendants. 20 21 COMES NOW Plaintiff, TONIE ROBINSON, ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel of 22 record, Richard Harris Law Firm, Defendant MV TRANSPORTATION, INC., by and through its 23 counsel of record, Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman LLP, and hereby stipulate and agree to the 24 following: 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 LEGAL:10640-0209/8670748.1 1 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action, 2 asserting a violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) 42 U.S.C. § 12, 101 et. seq., is 3 hereby dismissed with prejudice. 4 THE PARTIES FURTHER STIPULATE AND AGREE that the briefing schedule and ----- ____ 5 hearing associated with MV Transportation, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment regarding 6 Plaintiff's Second Cause of Action, asserting a violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act 7 (ADA) 42 U.S.C. § 12, 101 et. seq., filed with the Court on February 13, 2018, Document Number 8 22, is hereby vacated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that MV Transportation, Inc.'s Motion for 9 Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. Attorneys at Law 7674 WEST LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD, SUITE 150 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89128-6644 TELEPHONE 702 251 4100 ♦ FAX 702 251 5405 WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 DATED this 27th day of February, 2018 DATED this 27th day of February, 2018 12 WOOD SMITH HENNING & BERMAN, LLP /s/ Analise N. Martinez 13 Brooke A. Bohlke 14 Nevada Bar No. 9374 Analise N. Martinez 15 Nevada Bar No. 13185 Attorneys for Defendant 16 MV TRANSPORTATION, INC. RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM /s/ David J. Martin David J. Martin, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9117 Attorneys for Plaintiff TONIE ROBINSON 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 12th March 21 21st 28th February Dated this ____ day of ___________, 2018. 21 __________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Court 22 DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGAL:10640-0209/8670748.1 -2- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 27th day of February, 2018, a true and correct copy 3 of STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION 4 WITH PREJUDICE AND VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE was served via the United States 5 District Court CM/ECF system on all parties or persons requiring notice. 6 By /s/ Cindy A. Mulder An Employee of WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP 7 8 9 Attorneys at Law 7674 WEST LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD, SUITE 150 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89128-6644 TELEPHONE 702 251 4100 ♦ FAX 702 251 5405 WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGAL:10640-0209/8670748.1 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?