Perez-Marquez v. Gentry et al
Filing
89
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 85 the motion to withdraw is GRANTED. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that 86 the motion to stay proceedings is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/19/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
Case 2:17-cv-01501-RFB-BNW Document 89 Filed 11/19/20 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
OSCAR PEREZ-MARQUEZ,
9
Petitioner,
10
11
Case No. 2:17-cv-01501-RFB-BNW
ORDER
v.
JO GENTRY, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
Currently before the court are two motions. First, counsel for petitioner, David Neidert, has
15
requested permission to withdraw because he has not sought reappointment to the CJA Panel and
16
is winding down his legal practice. ECF No. 85. Second, Neidert has asked the court to stay the
17
action while replacement counsel is located. ECF No. 86. The court grants both requests.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the motion to withdraw (ECF No. 85) is GRANTED.
18
19
The representation of petitioner by David Neidert is terminated.
20
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court send a copy of this order to Kim
21
Driggers at the Office of the Federal Public Defender, who must locate substitute counsel for
22
petitioner.
23
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court send a copy of this order to
24
petitioner himself, Oscar Perez-Marquez, #91579, Southern Desert Correctional Center, P.O. Box
25
208, Indian Springs, NV 89070.
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
Case 2:17-cv-01501-RFB-BNW Document 89 Filed 11/19/20 Page 2 of 2
1
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the motion to stay proceedings (ECF No. 86) is
2
GRANTED. The clerk of the court is directed to administratively close this action until such time
3
as the court orders the action to be reopened.
4
DATED: November 19, 2020.
5
______________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?