Gryglak v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al

Filing 80

ORDER Granting 79 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 74 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff's Replies due by 4/25/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5

Edward Griffith
(admitted pro hac vice)
THE GRIFFITH FIRM
45 Broadway, Suite 2200
New York, New York 10006
[phone]
[phone] (cell)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plainitff Edyta Gryglak

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9

EDYTA GRYGLAK, formerly known as
EDYTA A. FROMKIN,

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01514-JCM-NJK

Plaintiff,

10
11

vs.

12

HSBC BANK USA, N.A., as trustee for
WELLS FARGO HOME EQUITY ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES, Series 2006-3,
by its Attorney-in-fact WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A.; WELLS FARGO BANK,
N.A.; and WELLS FARGO ASSET
SECURITIES CORPORATION,

13

14
15

18
19
20
21
22
23

24
25
26
27

(First Request)

Defendants.

16
17

STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S
DUE DATE TO FILE REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Defendants HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as trustee for Wells Fargo Home Equity Asset-Backed
Certificates, Series 2006-3, by its Attorney-in-fact Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., and Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff
Edyta Gryglak (“Plaintiff” and together with Defendants, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate to extend
by one week the due date for Plaintiff to file her Reply in further support of her Motion for
Preliminary Injunction [ECF 74]. If approved, this stipulation would extend the due date from April
18, 2019 to April 25, 2019.
WHEREAS the deadline for Plaintiff to file her Reply in further support of her Motion for
Preliminary Injunction is April 18, 2019.
WHEREAS the Parties now stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to file her
Reply from April 18, 2019 to April 25, 2019.

28
-14820-2175-1115
21894686.2

1

WHEREAS, this is the first request for an extension of time for Plaintiff to file her Reply

2

in further support of her Motion for Preliminary Injunction and is not intended to cause any delay

3

or prejudice to any party. The reason for the extension is the workload of Plaintiff’s counsel,

4

including extensive out-of-town work on other matters over the last week, which has caused him

5

to need more time to prepare and file Plaintiff’s Reply.

6

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE:

7

1.

8
9
10
11
12
13

14
15
16

The deadline for Plaintiff to file her Reply in further support of her Motion for

Preliminary Injunction is extended from April 18, 2019 to April 25, 2019.
Dated: April 18, 2019

Dated: April 18, 2019

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

THE GRIFFITH FIRM

/s/ Blakeley E. Griffith

/s/ Edward Griffith

By:
Blakeley E. Griffith (NV Bar No. 12386)
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
[phone]

[phone] (fax)

By:
Edward Griffith (pro hac vice)
45 Broadway, Suite 2200
New York, New York 10006
[phone]
[phone] (fax)

Attorneys for Defendants

Attorney for Plaintiff

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

24
25
26
27
28
-24820-2175-1115
21894686.2

ORDER

1
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the due date for Plaintiff to file Reply papers in further

3

support of her Motion for Preliminary Injunction is extended by one week, from April 18, 2019 to

4

April 25, 2019.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

DATED this19th day of April 2019.
___

7
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-34820-2175-1115
21894686.2

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

I hereby certify that on April 18, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing STIPULATION

3

with the Clerk of Court for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada by using the Court’s CM/ECF

4

system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF

5

system.

6
7

DATED this 18th day of April 2019.
/s/ Edward Griffith

8

EDWARD GRIFFITH, ESQ

9
10
11
12
13

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

24
25
26
27
28
-44820-2175-1115
21894686.2