Bond Manufacturing Co. v. Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc.

Filing 9

ORDER Granting 8 Stipulation to Extend Time re 7 MOTION to Dismiss re 1 Complaint. (Responses due by 8/28/2017.) Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:17-cv-01522-JCM-CWH Document 8 Filed 08/04/17 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

F. Christopher Austin (Nevada Bar No. 6559)
[e-mail]
Ryan Gile (Nevada Bar No. 8807)
[e-mail]
WEIDE & MILLER, LTD.
Bank of Nevada Bldg., 5th Floor
7251 West Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 530
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Bond Manufacturing Co., Inc.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11

BOND MANUFACTURING CO., INC., a
California corporation,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES,
INC., a Wisconsin corporation;,

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01522-JCM-CWH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS
(First Request)

15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff BOND MANUFACTURING CO., INC.

20

(“Plaintiff” or “Bond”) and Defendant ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.

21

(“Defendant” or "Ashley"), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate to a 21-day

22

extension of time up to and including August 28, 2017, for Plaintiff to file an Opposition to

23

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(6) (ECF No. 7) (“Motion to

24

Dismiss”).

25

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was filed on July 24, 2017. Plaintiff’s Opposition to

26

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is currently due August 7, 2017. By this Stipulation the parties

27

agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file its Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

28

by 21 days to August 28, 2017. This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension of time to file an

W EIDE & MILLER, LTD.
7251 W. LAKE MEAD BLVD.,
SUITE 530
LAS VEGAS,
NEVADA 89128
[phone]

FCA-W-0582

1

Case 2:17-cv-01522-JCM-CWH Document 8 Filed 08/04/17 Page 2 of 2

1

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Good cause exists because scheduling conflicts

2

with other client matters have delayed Plaintiff’s counsel in discussing Defendant’s Motion to

3

Dismiss and Plaintiff’s counsel requires additional time to confer with Plaintiff and to prepare the

4

Opposition. For this reason, this Request is made for good cause and not for purposes of delay.

5
6

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 31st day of July, 2017

7
WEIDE & MILLER, LTD.

MCDONALD CARANO LLP

By:
/s/ Ryan Gile
F. Christopher Austin (NSBN 6559)
Ryan Gile (NSBN 8807)
Bank of Nevada Bldg., 5th Floor
7251 West Lake Mead Blvd., Ste. 530
Las Vegas, NV 89128

By:
/s/ Craig A. Newby
Craig A. Newby (NSBN 8591)
Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416)
2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
Las Vegas, NV 89102

Attorneys for Plaintiff
BOND MANUFACTURING CO,, INC.

Attorneys for Defendant
ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED:
16
17
18

UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
August 9, 2017
DATED:

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
W EIDE & MILLER, LTD.
7251 W. LAKE MEAD BLVD.,
SUITE 530
LAS VEGAS,
NEVADA 89128
[phone]

FCA-W-0582

2