Rogich et al v. Clark County School District

Filing 93

ORDER granting 92 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to 87 Motion for Attorney Fees. Responses due by 1/31/2022. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/3/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-01541-RFB-NJK Document 93 Filed 01/03/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL PHOEBE V. REDMOND, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9657 5100 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 Tel: (702) 799-5373 Fax: (702) 799-5505 redmopv@nv.ccsd.net Attorney for Defendant, Clark County School District 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 O.R., BY AND THROUGH HER PARENTS, SIG AND LORI ROGICH AND SIG AND LORI ROGICH, INDIVIDUALLY, 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. (THIRD REQUEST) Defendant. 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS FILED PURSUANT TO ECF No. 87 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 16 19 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-01541-RFB-NJK COME NOW, Plaintiffs O.R., by and through her Parents, Sig and Lori Rogich and Sig and Lori Rogich, individually, (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant Clark County School District (“Defendant”), by and through their attorneys of record, and hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant may have up to and including January 31, 2022, to respond to PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COST, Filed Pursuant to ECF No. 87 in this matter. On December 12, 2021, the Court ordered that Defendant’s response was due January 3, 2022 (ECF No. 91). The Plaintiffs and Defendant acknowledge that a settlement check has been issued by Defendant and received by the Plaintiffs. Additional time is needed to allow the deposited funds to be processed and released by Plaintiffs’ bank. Upon release of the Case 2:17-cv-01541-RFB-NJK Document 93 Filed 01/03/22 Page 2 of 2 1 settlement funds by Plaintiffs’ bank, Plaintiffs will withdraw their pending Motion thereby 2 rendering the subject moot. This is the third request for an extension of time, however, this 3 request is being entered for good cause, in good faith and not for reason of delay. 4 5 6 THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request the response due date be extended up to and including January 31, 2022. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 7 Dated: January 3, 2022. Dated: January 3, 2022. 8 FREEMAN LAW OFFICES, LLC CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL By: /s Hillary Freeman_______________ HILLARY D. FREEMAN, ESQ. N.J. Attorney I.D. #002362006 103 Carnegie Center, Suite 300 Princeton, New Jersey 08540 Attorneys for Plaintiffs By: /s/ _Phoebe Redmond_____________ PHOEBE V. REDMOND, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9657 5100 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 Attorney for Defendant 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 DATED:_____________________________ 23 DATED this 3rd day of January, 2022. 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?