New Vision Gaming & Development, Inc. v. Bally Gaming Inc.

Filing 58

ORDER Granting 57 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 50 Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. Responses due by 9/18/2018. Replies due by 10/2/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

___________________________________________________________________________
The Above Space is Reserved for Use by the Clerk of Court

Karl Andersen, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 10306
Samuel G. Broyles, Jr., Esq. APC
Nevada State Bar No. 5888
ANDERSEN & BROYLES, LLP
5550 Painted Mirage Road, Suite 320
Las Vegas Nevada 89149
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702-834-4529
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Jessica L. Everett-Garcia (AZ #018359)
[e-mail]
John H. Gray (AZ #028107)
[e-mail]
Nathan R. Kassebaum (AZ #030646)
[e-mail] (admitted pro hac vice)
PERKINS COIE LLP
2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2788
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 602.648.7000
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

18
19
20
21
22

NEW VISION GAMING AND
DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Massachusetts
corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.

23
24
25
26
27
28

BALLY GAMING INC, dba BALLY
TECHNOLOGIES, a Nevada corporation,
Defendant.

Civil Case No. 2:17-cv-01559-APG-PAL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO FED. R.
CIV. P. 12(c) THAT U.S. PATENTS NOS.
7,325,806 AND 7,451,987 ARE INVALID
UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101
(FIRST REQUESTED EXTENSION)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6, and Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the
parties, through counsel, Plaintiff NEW VISION GAMING AND DEVELOPMENT, INC., a
Page 1 of 3

1
2

Massachusetts corporation, through Karl Andersen, Esq., and Defendant BALLY GAMING
INC, dba BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, a Nevada corporation, through PERKINS COIE, LLP,
and hereby stipulate and agree to enlarge the time for Plaintiff to file an opposition to the

3
4
5
6
7

Motion for MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO
FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c) THAT U.S. PATENTS NOS. 7,325,806 AND 7,451,987 ARE
INVALID UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Document 50)(the "Motion") filed by the Defendant and
served on the Plaintiff on August 21, 2018.
The parties acknowledge (1) this is the FIRST REQUEST to enlarge the time to file an

8

opposition to the Motion; and, (2) additional time is needed for the Plaintiff to adequately

9

address all the issues raised by the Motion.

10
11
12

The parties acknowledge, given the date of service of the Motion by electronic
delivery, that the last day for Plaintiff to file an opposition was September 4, 2018.
The parties further stipulate and agree to enlarge this period of time to file a Response
from September 4, 2018, to September 18, 2018.

13
14
15

The parties further stipulate that the deadline to enter the REPLY in support of ECF
#50 (Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings) be continued seven (7) additional calendar
days from the standard deadline, or until October 2, 2018.

16
17
18
19
20
21

Dated: September 4, 2018

Dated September 4, 2018

ANDERSEN & BROYLES, LLP

PERKINS COIE LLP

/s/ Karl Andersen______________________
Karl Andersen, Esq.
5550 Painted Mirage Road, Suite 320
Las Vegas, Nevada 89149
Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ John H. Gray _______________________
John H. Gray, Esq.
2901 North Central Avenue Suite 2000
Phoenix, Arizona 85012
Attorney for Defendant

22
23
24
25
26

"IT IS SO ORDERED:
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: September 6, 2018.
DATED: ___________________________

27
28

Page 2 of 3