Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Sunrise Ridge Master Homeowners Association et al
Filing
54
ORDER Granting 53 Stipulation to CONTINUE Date to File Motions and Pretrial Order. Motions due by 10/8/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/8/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1 MICHAEL F. BOHN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 1641
2 mbohn@bohnlawfirm.com
NIKOLL NIKCI, ESQ.
3 Nevada Bar No.: 10699
nnikci@bohnlawfirm.com
4 LAW OFFICES OF
MICHAEL F. BOHN, ESQ., LTD.
5 2260 Corporate Cir, Suite 480
Henderson, Nevada 89074
6 (702) 642-3113/ (702) 642-9766 FAX
Attorney for defendants Saticoy Bay LLC
7 Series 4039 Meadow Foxtail Dr. and
4039 Meadow Foxtail Dr Trust
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC,
CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-01586-RFB-NJK
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
14
SUNRISE RIDGE MASTER HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION; 4039 MEADOW FOXTAIL
DR. TRUST; SATICOY BAY LLC, SERIES
4039 MEADOW FOXTAIL DR.; NEVADA
ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.,
15
16
Defendants.
17
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE DATE TO FILE MOTIONS
AND PRETRIAL ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between defendant Saticoy Bay LLC
19 Series 4039 Meadow Foxtail Dr. and 4039 Meadow Foxtail Dr Trust (hereinafter “Saticoy Bay” or
20 “defendant”), through its attorney, the Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Esq., Ltd.; plaintiff Nationstar
21 Mortgage LLC, by and through its counsel, Melanie D. Morgan, Esq.; and defendant Sunrise Ridge
22 Master Homeowners Association (“HOA”), by and through its counsel, J. William Ebert, Esq., as
23 follows:
24
1. On March 23, 2018, this court entered an order staying this matter.
25
2. As part of the stay order, this court denied Saticoy Bay’s motion to dismiss [ECF No. 12] and
26 motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 41]; plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 40];
27
28
1
1 and the HOA’s motion to dismiss [ECF No. 14] and motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 42] without
2 prejudice.
3
3. On August 2, 2018, the Nevada Supreme Court answered the certified question.
4
4. On August 23, 2018, the court entered a minute order that the stay be lifted.
5
5. The order extended the deadline to file any dispositive motions to September 24, 2018.
6
6. Due to the number of cases which have become unstayed as a result of the resolution of the
7 certified question, counsel for all parties wish to have additional time to file modified or renewed
8 motions.
9
10
11
6. Accordingly, the parties hereby request this court set the following deadlines
a.
All parties shall have until October 8, 2018, to file modified or renewed motions
for summary judgment.
12 / / /
13 / / /
14 / / /
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
4
b.
The parties shall file their pretrial order no later than November 8, 2018, which
date shall be stayed by the filing of a motion or motions for summary judgment.
Dated this 20th day of September, 2018.
5
LAW OFFICES OF
MICHAEL F. BOHN, ESQ., LTD.
AKERMAN LLP
By: /s/ Scott Lachman, Esq.
Melanie D. Morgan, Esq.
Scott Lachman, Esq.
1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Attorney for plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage
LLC
11
By: /s/ Nikoll Nikci, Esq.
Michael F. Bohn, Esq.
Nikoll Nikci, Esq.
2260 Corporate Cir, Suite 480
Henderson, Nevada 89074
Attorney for defendants Saticoy Bay LLC
Series 4039 Meadow Foxtail Dr. and 4039
Meadow Foxtail Dr Trust
12
LIPSON, NEILSON P.C.
13
By: /s/ Megan H. Hummel, Esq.
J. William Ebert, Esq.
Megan H. Hummel, Esq.
9900 Covington Cross Dr, Suite 120
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Attorney for defendant Sunrise Ridge
Master Homeowners Association
6
7
8
9
10
14
15
16
17
18
19
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the dates are hereby set as stated above.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
__________________________
_____________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
United States District Court
21
22
23
September 23, 2018.
DATED: _________________________
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?