Day v. Longvue Mortgage Capital Inc., et al
Filing
39
ORDER granting 34 Motion to Set Aside 29 Clerk's Entry of Default. FURTHER ORDERED the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
RANDOLPH DAY,
7
Plaintiff,
ORDER
8
9
10
Case No. 2:17-cv-01596-JAD-CWH
v.
LONGVUE MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC., et
al.,
Defendants.
11
Presently before the court is defendant Longvue Mortgage Capital Inc.’s (“Longvue”)
12
13
motion to set aside default (ECF No. 34), supported by Ramir M. Herndadez’s declaration (ECF
14
No. 35), filed on February 5, 2018. Plaintiff Randolph Day filed a response (ECF Nos. 36, 37) on
15
February 20, 2018, to which defendant replied (ECF No. 38) on February 27, 2018.
16
I.
BACKGROUND
17
The court granted three stipulations to extend Longvue’s deadline to answer or otherwise
18
respond to the complaint in this case. (Orders (ECF Nos. 17, 19, 23).) The third order extended
19
the deadline to answer until August 18, 2017. (Order (ECF No. 23).) Longvue did not file a
20
responsive pleading, and on October 20, 2017, Day moved for an entry of default. (Mot. for
21
Entry of Clerk’s Default (ECF No. 27).) On October 23, 2017, the clerk entered default against
22
Longvue. (Clerk’s Entry of Default (ECF No. 29).) On the same day, Longvue filed an answer.
23
(Ans. (ECF No. 30).) Longvue now moves to set aside the clerk’s entry of default.
24
II.
25
DISCUSSION
Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of the Civil Procedure provides a mechanism for obtaining a
26
default judgment against a party who has failed to plead or otherwise respond to claims brought
27
against it. Where this failure is “shown by affidavit or otherwise,” the clerk must enter a party’s
28
1
default under Rule 55(a). The court may set aside an entry of default for “good cause.” Fed. R.
2
Civ. P. 55(c); United States v. Signed Pers. Check No. 730 of Yubran S. Mesle (“Mesle”), 615
3
F.3d 1085, 1091 (9th Cir. 2010). Good cause is determined by the three “Falk” factors: (1)
4
whether the plaintiff would be prejudiced if the default is set aside, (2) whether the defendant has
5
a meritorious defense, and (3) whether the defendant engaged in culpable conduct that led to the
6
default. Id.; Falk v. Allen, 739 F.2d 461, 463 (9th Cir. 1984). It is within the court’s discretion
7
whether to set aside a default. Mesle, 615 F.3d at 1091. A positive determination of any of the
8
three disjunctive Falk factors is sufficient to set aside the clerk’s default. See Brandt v. American
9
Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla., 653 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 2011). The standard conforms with the
10
Ninth Circuit’s “policy favoring judgements on the merits,” rather than by default. See e.g.,
11
Mesle, 615 F.3d at 1091.
12
To satisfy the “not extraordinarily heavy” burden of presenting a meritorious defense, the
13
defendant seeking to vacate a default must present specific facts that would constitute a defense.
14
TCI Grp. Life Ins. Plan v. Knoebber, 244 F.3d 691, 700 (9th Cir. 2001). There must be some
15
possibility that the suit would have a different outcome at trial than the result achieved by default.
16
Hawaii Carpenters’ Trust Funds v. Stone, 794 F.2d 508, 513 (9th Cir. 1986).
17
Longvue argues that it has meritorious defenses to Day’s allegations, as set forth in its
18
answer to the complaint. Day argues that Longvue is required to articulate facts supporting its
19
contention that it has a meritorious defense. Having reviewed Longvue’s answer, the court finds
20
that the document raises the possibility of a meritorious defense. The answer raises eight
21
affirmative defenses, including failure to state a claim, equitable doctrines, waiver and estoppel.
22
(Ans. (ECF No. 30).) Success on any one of these eight affirmative defenses would result in an
23
outcome other than default. See Stone, 794 F.2d at 513-14. Having satisfied at least one of the
24
factors, the court need not proceed further to the remaining factors to find the default be set aside.
25
See Brandt, 653 F.3d at 1111. Further, the case is in its early stages and the parties have not yet
26
commenced discovery. Thus, there is minimal prejudice to Day as a result of setting aside the
27
clerk’s default.
28
Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
III.
CONCLUSION
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant’s motion to set aside the default (ECF No.
34) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the parties must meet and confer and file a proposed
discovery plan and scheduling order within 21 days.
6
7
DATED: August 8, 2018
8
9
10
C.W. HOFFMAN, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?