Albanese v. Federal Bureau of Investigations
Filing
12
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 9 , 10 and 11 Requests. Plaintiff must comply with the process outlined in the attached letter. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
Case 2:17-cv-01599-JAD-VCF Document 12 Filed 03/01/22 Page 1 of 3
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 Grace Albanese,
4
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01599-JAD-VCF
Plaintiff
5 v.
Order Denying Request
6 The Federal Bureau of Investigation,
7
[ECF Nos 9, 10, 11]
Defendant
8
In three separate letters to the court, Plaintiff Grace Albanese asks the court to rescind her
9 vexatious-litigant status. 1 Albanese’s request does not comply with the process outlined in the
10 attached letter, which was sent to her by this court’s Chief Judge. As the court stated it would in
11 the attached letter if Albanese did not comply with the process provided therein, IT IS
12 ORDERED that the court denies these requests [ECF Nos. 9, 10, 11]. If Albanese would like
13 to file any further cases or documents with the court, she must first comply with the process
14 provided in the attached letter. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Albanese a copy of this
15 order along with the attached letter.
16
_________________________________
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
March 1, 2022
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1
ECF Nos. 9, 10, 11.
Case 2:17-cv-01599-JAD-VCF Document 12 Filed 03/01/22 Page 2 of 3
United States District Court
District of Nevada
Chambers of
Miranda M. Du
Chief Judge
Bruce R. Thompson U.S.
Courthouse & Federal Building
400 South Virginia Street
Reno, Nevada 89501
(775) 686-5919
June 22, 2021
Grace Albanese
General Delivery
Las Vegas, NV 89030
VIA U.S. Mail
Re:
Your Request to File More Lawsuits Despite the Previous Order Declaring You a
Vexatious Litigant
Dear Ms. Albanese:
I received your enclosed letter in my capacity as Chief Judge. Judge Dorsey previously
declared you a vexatious litigant. See Albanese v. Federal Bureau of Investigations, Case No.
2:17-cv-01599-JAD-VCF, ECF No. 7 at 5 (D. Nev. Jul. 27, 2017). Your request in your attached
letter to file additional lawsuits is denied because you have not provided me with enough
information to determine whether your proposed lawsuits are frivolous. See De Long v.
Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1148 (9th Cir. 1990) (“it is incumbent on the court to make
‘substantive findings as to the frivolous or harassing nature of the litigant’s actions.’”).
If you wish to file one or more lawsuits with this Court, please prepare a letter addressed
to me explaining why those proposed lawsuits are not frivolous, along with:
1.
A proposed Complaint for each lawsuit; and
2.
A sworn declaration stating: (a) that the matters asserted in the new complaint or papers
have never been raised and disposed of on the merits by any court; (b) that the claim or
claims are not frivolous or made in bad faith; and (c) that you have conducted a
reasonable investigation of the facts, and your investigation supports your proposed
claim or claims.
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
Case 2:17-cv-01599-JAD-VCF Document 12 Filed 03/01/22 Page 3 of 3
If you do not comply with these requirements, I will summarily deny any future requests
to file new lawsuits.
Sincerely,
Miranda Du
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?