Albanese v. Federal Bureau Of Investigation

Filing 4

ORDER that 3 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; and Albanese's claims are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Grace Albanese, 5 2:17-cv-01614-JAD-PAL Plaintiff 6 v. 7 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case The Federal Bureau of Investigation, 8 [ECF Nos. 1, 3] Defendant 9 10 11 Pro se plaintiff Grace Albanese brings this civil rights complaint against the FBI for 12 violations of her due process and equal protection rights, and she also applied to proceed in forma 13 pauperis.1 Magistrate Judge Leen recommends that I deny Albanese’s application to proceed in 14 forma pauperis and, after screening her complaint, recommends that I dismiss this case.2 The report and recommendation was entered July 24, 2017, making August 7, 2017, the 15 16 deadline to file an objection. Albanese has not filed any objection to the report and 17 recommendation. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 18 unless objections are filed.” Accordingly, with good cause appearing and no reason to delay, IT IS 19 HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leen’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 3] is 20 ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; Albanese’s request to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 1] is 21 DENIED; and Albanese’s claims are DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE 22 THIS CASE and enter judgment accordingly. DATED August 9, 2017. 23 _________________________________ Jennifer A. Dorsey United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 1 ECF Nos. 1, 1-1. 28 2 ECF No. 3.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?