Dixon v. Director Nevada State Prison et al

Filing 9

ORDER that Dixon has until July 9, 2018, to FILE a second-amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus that names the correct respondents. FURTHER ORDERED that Dixon must file his second-amended petition on this court's form rather than the document that he used for this first-amended petition.The Clerk of Court is directed to SEND to Dixon two copies of a noncapital § 2254 petition form, instructions for completing it, and one copy of his first-amended petition (ECF No. 7 ). Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Robert Dixon, 4 Case No.: 2:17-cv-01636-JAD-GWF Petitioner 5 6 v. 7 Order Nevada Dept. of Parole and Probation, et al., Respondents 8 9 Pro se petitioner and parolee Robert Dixon was convicted in 1989 of two counts of 10 trafficking a controlled substance, and he received a life sentence on each count. 1 An amended 11 judgment was entered, making Dixon eligible parole after 15 years on the first count and after 25 12 years on the second count. 2 He petitions for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and 13 argues that his continued custody on parole violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments 14 because his sentence violates NRS 453.3395(2). 3 15 This is Dixon’s second attempt to petition for relief in this case. When I screened 16 Dixon’s first petition, I found that he had not named the proper respondents, and I ordered him to 17 fix that deficiency in an amended petition by naming “his parole officer, the officer in charge of 18 the state parole agency, [and] the state attorney general as required by the petition form, and 19 possibly the official in charge of the state department of corrections.” 4 Dixon did not do so; his 20 amended petition still has the same incorrect-respondent deficiencies that I previously identified. 21 So, I give him one last chance to amend his petition and name the appropriate respondents. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Dixon has until July 9, 2018, to FILE a 23 second-amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus that names the correct respondents. 24 25 26 27 28 1 ECF No. 7 at 3. 2 Id. 3 Id. 4 ECF No. 1. 1 1 Dixon MUST name his parole officer and the officer in charge of the parole agency in the 2 second-amended petition, otherwise this case will be DISMISSED without further prior 3 notice. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dixon must file his second-amended petition on this 5 court’s form rather than the document that he used for this first-amended petition. Dixon’s first6 amended petition violates Local Rule LSR 3-1; violating the local rules may also lead to 7 dismissal of an action. Dixon is advised that he must sign both signature blocks at the end of 8 this court’s form habeas petition. He must also write the words “SECOND AMENDED” 9 immediately above “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus” on page 1 in the caption, and he 10 must write the case number 2:17-cv-01636-JAD-GWF above the words “SECOND 11 AMENDED.” 12 An amended petition must be complete in itself, and it must include all claims for relief 13 that the petitioner knows about. I will only consider claims in the second-amended petition. 14 This means that Dixon must include all claims from his original and first-amended petitions in 15 his second-amended petition if he wants me to consider them as bases for granting habeas relief. 16 If Dixon fails to file a second-amended petition or files a second-amended petition 17 that still has any of the deficiencies that I have outlined in this order, this case will be 18 DISMISSED without further prior notice. 19 The Clerk of Court is directed to SEND to Dixon two copies of a noncapital § 2254 20 petition form, instructions for completing it, and one copy of his first-amended petition (ECF No. 21 7). 22 Dated: May 9, 2018 _______________________________ ______________________ _ _________ _ U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey .S. District Judge Jennifer ic ic d J i 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?