Board of Trustees of the Glazing Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Z-Glass, Inc. et al

Filing 90

ORDER Granting 89 Stipulation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ANNA AND MATTHEW OLIN are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The motions to dismiss filed by Anna and Matthew Olin 50 , 51 are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-01638-JAD-NJK Document 89 Filed 07/25/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 David Mincin, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5427 MINCIN LAW, PLLC 7465 W. Lake Mead Boulevard, #100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 dmincin@mincinlaw.com Phone: 702-852-1957 Fax: N/A Attorney for Defendants Z-Glass, Inc., Zetian Systems West, Inc., Matthew Olin, Anna Olin And Weina Zhang 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GLAZING HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND;; et. al, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case No.: 17-CV-01638-JAD-NJK Plaintiffs, vs. Z-GLASS INC., a Nevada Corporation; ZETIAN SYSTEMS, INC., a Nevada Corporation; ZETIAN SYSTEMS WEST, INC., a California Corporation; WESTERNGLASS SYSTEMS INC., a Nevada Corporation; JOHN DOES I-XX, inclusive; and ROE ENTITIES I-XX, inclusive, ECF Nos. 50, 51, 89 Defendants. STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ANNA OLIN AND MATTHEW OLIN WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants Matthew Olin and Anna Olin, by and through their counsel of record, David Mincin, Esq.; and Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel of record, Wesley Smith, Esq., stipulate and agree as follows. It Is Hereby Stipulated that all claims against Anna Olin and Matthew Olin be dismissed, without prejudice, Matthew Olin, Anna Olin, and Plaintiffs to bear their own attorneys fees and costs as to each other. 26 27 28 Page 1 of 3 W:\2017 - DM\4225glazinghealth.z-glass\Stip & Ordr To Dismiss M Olin & A Olin Without Prejudice...DMcb...7-24-2018.wpd July 25, 2018 (2:12pm) Case 2:17-cv-01638-JAD-NJK Document 89 Filed 07/25/18 Page 2 of 3 1 2 It Is Further Stipulated that the Motions to Dismiss [ECF No. 50 & 51] filed by Matthew Olin and Anna Olin are hereby vacated as moot. 3 It Is Further Stipulated that this stipulation shall not affect any claims against any 4 other parties. 5 SO STIPULATED SO STIPULATED 6 DATED this 25th day of July, 2018. DATED this 25th day of July, 2018. MINCIN LAW, PLLC CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN By: By: /s/ Wesley Smith Wesley Smith, Esq. State Bar No. 11871 7440 W. Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Attorney for Board of Trustees of the Glazing Health and Welfare Fund, et al. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 /s/ David Mincin David Mincin, Esq. State Bar No.5427 7465 W. Lake Mead Boulevard, #100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 Attorney for Z-Glass, Inc., Anna Olin, Matthew Olin, Weina Zhang and Zetian Systems West, Inc. 14 15 16 ORDER 20 Based on stipulation between Anna and Matthew Olin Based on the the foregoing Stipulation between the parties:and the Plaintiffs [ECF No. 89], which I construe as a joint motion under Local Rule 7-1(c) because it was signed by IT all the parties or their attorneys, and with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY fewer thanIS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Anna Olin and Matthew Olin are ORDERED that ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ANNA Anna Olin, and Plaintiffs, to hereby dismissed, without prejudice, Matthew Olin, AND MATTHEW OLIN are bear their DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The motions to dismiss filed by Anna costs as to each other. own attorneys fees andand Matthew Olin [ECF Nos. 50, 51] are DENIED as moot. 21 /// 22 /// 17 18 19 23 _________________________________ ________________ _ _ __ _ __ U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey trict Ju ct ct Judge Jennifer e if Dated: July 26, 2018 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 3 W:\2017 - DM\4225glazinghealth.z-glass\Stip & Ordr To Dismiss M Olin & A Olin Without Prejudice...DMcb...7-24-2018.wpd July 25, 2018 (2:12pm)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?