Board of Trustees of the Glazing Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Z-Glass, Inc. et al
Filing
90
ORDER Granting 89 Stipulation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ANNA AND MATTHEW OLIN are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The motions to dismiss filed by Anna and Matthew Olin 50 , 51 are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-01638-JAD-NJK Document 89 Filed 07/25/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
David Mincin, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 5427
MINCIN LAW, PLLC
7465 W. Lake Mead Boulevard, #100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
dmincin@mincinlaw.com
Phone: 702-852-1957
Fax: N/A
Attorney for Defendants Z-Glass, Inc.,
Zetian Systems West, Inc., Matthew Olin,
Anna Olin And Weina Zhang
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
GLAZING HEALTH AND WELFARE
FUND;; et. al,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case No.: 17-CV-01638-JAD-NJK
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Z-GLASS INC., a Nevada Corporation;
ZETIAN SYSTEMS, INC., a Nevada
Corporation; ZETIAN SYSTEMS WEST,
INC., a California Corporation;
WESTERNGLASS SYSTEMS INC., a
Nevada Corporation; JOHN DOES I-XX,
inclusive; and ROE ENTITIES I-XX,
inclusive,
ECF Nos. 50, 51, 89
Defendants.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS
ANNA OLIN AND MATTHEW OLIN WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Defendants Matthew Olin and Anna Olin, by and through their counsel of record,
David Mincin, Esq.; and Plaintiffs, by and through their counsel of record, Wesley Smith,
Esq., stipulate and agree as follows.
It Is Hereby Stipulated that all claims against Anna Olin and Matthew Olin be
dismissed, without prejudice, Matthew Olin, Anna Olin, and Plaintiffs to bear their own
attorneys fees and costs as to each other.
26
27
28
Page 1 of 3
W:\2017 - DM\4225glazinghealth.z-glass\Stip & Ordr To Dismiss M Olin & A Olin Without Prejudice...DMcb...7-24-2018.wpd
July 25, 2018 (2:12pm)
Case 2:17-cv-01638-JAD-NJK Document 89 Filed 07/25/18 Page 2 of 3
1
2
It Is Further Stipulated that the Motions to Dismiss [ECF No. 50 & 51] filed by
Matthew Olin and Anna Olin are hereby vacated as moot.
3
It Is Further Stipulated that this stipulation shall not affect any claims against any
4
other parties.
5
SO STIPULATED
SO STIPULATED
6
DATED this 25th day of July, 2018.
DATED this 25th day of July, 2018.
MINCIN LAW, PLLC
CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN
By:
By: /s/ Wesley Smith
Wesley Smith, Esq.
State Bar No. 11871
7440 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Attorney for Board of Trustees of
the Glazing Health and Welfare
Fund, et al.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
/s/ David Mincin
David Mincin, Esq.
State Bar No.5427
7465 W. Lake Mead Boulevard, #100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
Attorney for Z-Glass, Inc.,
Anna Olin, Matthew Olin,
Weina Zhang and
Zetian Systems West, Inc.
14
15
16
ORDER
20
Based on stipulation between Anna and Matthew Olin
Based on the the foregoing Stipulation between the parties:and the Plaintiffs [ECF No.
89], which I construe as a joint motion under Local Rule 7-1(c) because it was signed by
IT all the parties or their attorneys, and with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
fewer thanIS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Anna Olin and Matthew Olin are
ORDERED that ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ANNA Anna Olin, and Plaintiffs, to
hereby dismissed, without prejudice, Matthew Olin, AND MATTHEW OLIN are bear their
DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The motions to
dismiss filed by Anna costs as to each other.
own attorneys fees andand Matthew Olin [ECF Nos. 50, 51] are DENIED as moot.
21
///
22
///
17
18
19
23
_________________________________
________________
_ _ __ _ __
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
trict Ju
ct
ct Judge Jennifer
e if
Dated: July 26, 2018
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 3
W:\2017 - DM\4225glazinghealth.z-glass\Stip & Ordr To Dismiss M Olin & A Olin Without Prejudice...DMcb...7-24-2018.wpd
July 25, 2018 (2:12pm)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?