Belssner v. One Nevada Credit Union
Filing
7
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 4 Magistrate Judge Hoffman's report and recommendation be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint, (see ECF Nos. 1 -1, 5 ), is DISMISSED with prejudice. The clerk is instructed to close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
CHARLES N. BELSSNER,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
Case No. 2:17-CV-1648 JCM (VCF)
ORDER
v.
ONE NEVADA CREDIT UNION,
11
Defendant(s).
12
13
Presently before the court is Magistrate Judge Ferenbach’s report and recommendation
14
(R&R), recommending that pro se plaintiff Charles Belssner’s complaint (ECF Nos. 1-1 and 5)1
15
be dismissed with prejudice. (ECF No. 4). No objections have been filed, and the deadline for
16
filing objections has since passed.
17
This court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
18
recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party timely objects
19
to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, then the court is required to “make a de novo
20
determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made.”
21
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
22
Where a party fails to object, however, the court is not required to conduct “any review at
23
all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
24
(1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a
25
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See United
26
27
1
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
Plaintiff first attached the complaint to the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF
No. 1-1). After the entry of the R&R, the clerk filed the complaint separately. (ECF No. 5). This
order refers to both as “the complaint.”
1
States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003) (disregarding the standard of review
2
employed by the district court when reviewing a report and recommendation to which no
3
objections were made).
4
The deadline to object was August 17, 2017, and the plaintiff has still not done do so.
5
Nevertheless, this court has reviewed the recommendation and underlying motion and finds that
6
good cause appears to adopt the magistrate judge’s findings and rulings. Therefore, this court
7
adopts the R&R in its entirety.
8
Accordingly,
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Magistrate Judge
10
Hoffman’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 4) be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED in its
11
entirety.
12
13
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint, (see ECF Nos. 1-1, 5), is DISMISSED
with prejudice.
14
The clerk is instructed to close the case.
15
DATED September 6, 2017.
16
17
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?