Cohan v. Lombardo et al
Filing
33
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 31 plaintiff's motion for the release of documents be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 32 plaintiff's motion to be tried in the U.S. District Court as a non-compliant sex offender be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/26/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
JAMES E. COHAN,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
Case No. 2:17-CV-1651 JCM (NJK)
ORDER
v.
JOSEPH LOMBARDO, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
12
13
Presently before the court is the matter of Cohan v. Lombardo, et al., case number 2:17-
14
cv-01651-JCM-NJK. After this case was closed on July 20, 2019, (ECF No. 30), pro se plaintiff
15
James E Cohan (“plaintiff”) filed two motions (ECF Nos. 31; 32).
16
The first motion requests the court send plaintiff “all documents filed in this court.” (ECF
17
No. 31 at 2). The second is a “motion to be tried in the U.S. District Court as a non-compliant sex
18
offender.” (ECF No. 32).
19
Neither motion is supported by a memorandum of points and authorities, citation to legal
20
authority, or any cogent legal argument. Local Rule 7-2(d) provides that “[t]he failure of a moving
21
party to file points and authorities in support of the motion constitutes a consent to the denial of
22
the motion.”
23
Accordingly,
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s motion for the
25
release of documents (ECF No. 31) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
26
...
27
...
28
...
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to be tried in the U.S. District Court
as a non-compliant sex offender (ECF No. 32) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
DATED March 26, 2020.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?