Williams v. Wells Fargo Card Services et al

Filing 7

ORDER Granting 6 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 1 Complaint (First Request). Wells Fargo Card Services and Wells Fargo Financial Cards answer due 7/28/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kelly H. Dove, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10569 Tanya N. Lewis, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8855 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 kdove@swlaw.com tlewis@swlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Card Services and Wells Fargo Financial Cards) 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RILEY L. WILLIAMS, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 Case No. 2:17-cv-01655-RFB-VCF 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICES; WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL CARDS; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 16 Defendants. FIRST REQUEST 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Riley L. Williams (“Plaintiff”), through his attorneys, Haines & Krieger, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Card Services and Wells Fargo Financial Cards (“Wells Fargo”), through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows: Plaintiff filed his Complaint on June 14, 2017 [Docket No. 1]. In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, Wells Fargo requests, and Plaintiff agrees, that Wells Fargo shall have until July 28, 2017, to file its responsive pleading. This is the parties’ first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so that the parties may discuss settlement. 1 Dated June 28, 2017 2 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 3 By: /s/ Rachel B. Saturn David H. Krieger, Esq. Rachel B. Saturn HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 (signed with permission) 4 5 6 7 8 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. By: /s/ Tanya N. Lewis Kelly H. Dove, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10569 Tanya N. Lewis, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8855 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Defendant (incorrectly sued as Wells Fargo Card Services and Wells Fargo Financial Cards) Attorneys for Plaintiff Riley L. Williams 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be extended to on or before July 28, 2017. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 11 Snell & Wilmer Respectfully submitted by: 10 L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 9 Cam Ferenbach United States Magistrate Judge , 2017. June 28 /s/ Tanya N. Lewis Tanya N. Lewis, Esq. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 4 5 On June 28, 2017, I served the foregoing document on all parties appearing in this case when filing said document through the court’s PACER system with automatic e-service on all persons who have registered for e-service on PACER for this case. 6 /s/ Nissa Riley An Employee of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 7 4830-6456-0203 8 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?