Johnson v. Gentry et al
Filing
9
ORDER that, pursuant to the Court's screening order (ECF No. 4 ), this action shall proceed on the following claims: Count I will proceed against Defendants Lewis, Gentry, Dzurenda, Knatz, Adams, Dreesen, and Barrit, and will proceed against John Doe doctor, John Doe nurse, and mental health staffer Jane Doe, when Plaintiff learns their identities and amends the complaint to include those identities; the portion of Count II alleging an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs will proceed against Defendants Dzurenda and Gentry and will proceed against Defendant Jane Doe mental health staffer when Plaintiff discovers her identity and amends the complaint to include her identity; and the portion of Count II alleging an Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim will proceed against Defendants Willis, Jo Gentry, Adams, Dreesen, Lewis, and Dzurenda.FURTHER ORDERED that 6 , 7 Plaintiff's Motions to Exclude from Mediation are g ranted.FURTHER ORDERED that 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall SEND a copy of this order to the Finance Division of the Clerk's Office, and also to the attention of the Chi ef of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Corrections. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order, a copy of Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1-1), and a copy of the screening order (EC F No. 4) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada by adding the Attorney General of the State of Nevada to the docket sheet. This does not indicate acceptance of service. Service must be perfected within ninety (90) days from the date of this order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Subject to the findings of the screening order (ECF No. 4), within twenty-one (21) days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Cou rt and Plaintiff of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it accepts service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service, and (c) the names of the defendants for whom it is filing the last-known-address information under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
LAUSTEVEION JOHNSON,
Case No. 2:17-cv-01671-APG-VCF
10
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
11
GENTRY, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
I.
15
This action is a pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by
16
a state prisoner. Plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis and
17
has filed motions to exclude the case from mediation. (ECF No. 1, 6, 7). Based on the
18
financial information provided, the Court finds that Plaintiff is unable to prepay the full
19
filing fee in this matter. The Court also finds that Plaintiff has given sufficient reasons to
20
exclude the case from mediation.
21
DISCUSSION
The Court entered a screening order on May 23, 2018.
(ECF No. 4). The
22
screening order dismissed some claims with prejudice, dismissed an access to the courts
23
claim without prejudice with leave to amend, and permitted some claims to proceed. (Id.
24
at 16-17).
25
amended complaint curing the deficiencies of the access to the court claim. (Id. at 17).
26
The Court specifically stated that, if Plaintiff chose not to file an amended complaint, the
27
action would proceed on the following claims: Count I will proceed against Defendants
28
Lewis, Gentry, Dzurenda, Knatz, Adams, Dreesen, and Barrit, and will proceed against
The Court granted Plaintiff 30 days from the date of that order to file an
1
1
John Doe doctor, John Doe nurse, and mental health staffer Jane Doe, when Plaintiff
2
learns their identities and amends the complaint to include those identities; the portion of
3
Count II alleging an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to serious
4
medical needs will proceed against Defendants Dzurenda and Gentry and will proceed
5
against Defendant Jane Doe mental health staffer when Plaintiff discovers her identity
6
and amends the complaint to include her identity; and the portion of Count II alleging an
7
Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim will proceed against Defendants
8
Willis, Jo Gentry, Adams, Dreesen, Lewis, and Dzurenda. (Id.) As Plaintiff has not filed
9
an amended complaint, pursuant to the screening order, this action shall proceed on
10
those claims.
11
II.
CONCLUSION
12
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:
13
1.
Pursuant to the Court’s screening order (ECF No. 4), this action shall
14
proceed on the following claims: Count I will proceed against Defendants Lewis, Gentry,
15
Dzurenda, Knatz, Adams, Dreesen, and Barrit, and will proceed against John Doe doctor,
16
John Doe nurse, and mental health staffer Jane Doe, when Plaintiff learns their identities
17
and amends the complaint to include those identities; the portion of Count II alleging an
18
Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs will proceed
19
against Defendants Dzurenda and Gentry and will proceed against Defendant Jane Doe
20
mental health staffer when Plaintiff discovers her identity and amends the complaint to
21
include her identity; and the portion of Count II alleging an Eighth Amendment conditions
22
of confinement claim will proceed against Defendants Willis, Jo Gentry, Adams, Dreesen,
23
Lewis, and Dzurenda.
24
2.
25
granted.
26
3.
Plaintiff’s motions to exclude the case from mediation (ECF No. 6, 7) are
27
Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is granted.
Plaintiff shall not be required to pay an initial installment of the filing fee. In the event that
28
2
1
this action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2
1915(b)(2).
3
4.
The movant herein is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without
4
the necessity of prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of security
5
therefor. This order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis shall not extend to the
6
issuance and/or service of subpoenas at government expense.
7
5.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), the Nevada Department of Corrections
8
shall pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the
9
preceding month’s deposits to Plaintiff’s account (Lausteveion Johnson, #82138), in the
10
months that the account exceeds $10.00, until the full $350.00 filing fee has been paid
11
for this action. The Clerk of the Court shall SEND a copy of this order to the Finance
12
Division of the Clerk’s Office. The Clerk of the Court shall also SEND a copy of this order
13
to the attention of the Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Corrections,
14
P.O. Box 7011, Carson City, NV 89702.
15
6.
The Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order, a
16
copy of Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1), and a copy of the screening order (ECF No.
17
4) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada by adding the Attorney
18
General of the State of Nevada to the docket sheet. This does not indicate acceptance
19
of service.
20
21
22
7.
Service must be perfected within ninety (90) days from the date of this order
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
8.
Subject to the findings of the screening order (ECF No. 4), within twenty-
23
one (21) days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General’s Office shall file a
24
notice advising the Court and Plaintiff of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it
25
accepts service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service,
26
and (c) the names of the defendants for whom it is filing the last-known-address
27
information under seal. As to any of the named defendants for whom the Attorney
28
General’s Office cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, but shall not serve
3
1
the inmate Plaintiff the last known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom it has such
2
information. If the last known address of the defendant(s) is a post office box, the Attorney
3
General's Office shall attempt to obtain and provide the last known physical address(es).
4
9.
If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), Plaintiff
5
shall file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a
6
summons, and specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s).
7
defendant(s) as to which the Attorney General has not provided last-known-address
8
information, Plaintiff shall provide the full name and address for the defendant(s).
9
10.
For the
If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named
10
defendant(s), such defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the
11
complaint within sixty (60) days from the date of this order.
12
11.
Henceforth, Plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has
13
been entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other
14
document submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original
15
document submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of
16
the document was mailed or electronically filed to the defendants or counsel for the
17
defendants. If counsel has entered a notice of appearance, Plaintiff shall direct service
18
to the individual attorney named in the notice of appearance, at the physical or electronic
19
address stated therein. The Court may disregard any document received by a district
20
judge or magistrate judge which has not been filed with the Clerk, and any document
21
received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the Clerk which fails to include a
22
certificate showing proper service.
23
DATED THIS
12th
day of
July
2018.
24
25
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?