Louis Rock, et al v. Ninyo & Moore, Geotechnical Consultants
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Stipulation re Discovery. Discovery due by 6/25/2018. Motions due by 7/25/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SAO
ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 3402
TRACY A. EGLET, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6419
JOSEPH J. TROIANO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12505
EGLET PRINCE
400 South Seventh Street, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone:
(702) 450-5400
Facsimile:
(702) 450-5451
Email:
eservice@egletlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
12
13
14
LOUIS ROCK and DEBBY ROCK,
Individually and as Husband and Wife,
15
Plaintiffs,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
vs.
NINYO & MOORE, GEOTECHNICAL
CONSULTANTS dba NINYO & MOORE
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL
SCIENCES CONSULTANTS, a Foreign
Corporation; ROADSAFE TRAFFIC
SYSTEMS, INC., a Foreign Corporation; DOE
INDIVIDUALS 1 through 100; and ROE
CORPORATIONS 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
…
…
…
…
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-01676-APG-CWH
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES
(SECOND REQUEST)
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs LOUIS AND DEBBY ROCK,
2
by and through their counsel of record, JOSEPH TROIANO, ESQ., of EGLET PRINCE,
3
4
5
Defendant ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC. by and through their counsel of record,
JASON C. FOULGER, ESQ., of CISNEROS & MARIAS, Defendant NINYO & MOORE,
6
GEOTECHNICAL DBA CONSULTANTS DBA NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICAL &
7
ENVIROMENTAL SCIENCES CONSULTANTS by and through their counsel of record,
8
9
10
11
12
MICHAEL R. HALL, ESQ., of HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP., that discovery in this matter
shall be extended for the limited purpose of completing the discovery described herein. Pursuant
to Local Rules (“LR”) 6-1, 6-2, 7-1, and 26-4, the parties offer the following in support of their
stipulation to extend discovery:
13
I.
14
DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE
15
Plaintiffs served Defendants with the following discovery to date:
16
1.
Plaintiffs’ Initial NRCP 16.1 disclosures and Four (4) Supplements thereto;
17
2.
Plaintiffs’ Responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production, Requests for
18
19
20
21
22
Admissions and Interrogatories; and
3.
Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production, Requests for Admissions and Interrogatories
to Defendants;
4.
Plaintiffs’ Expert Disclosure and Supplemental NRCP 16.1 (a)(3) Pre-Trial
Disclosures and Two (2) Supplements thereto.
23
Defendant Roadsafe Traffic Systems, Inc., served Plaintiffs with the following
24
discovery to date:
25
1.
Defendant’s Initial NRCP 16.1 disclosure;
26
2.
Defendant’s Requests for Production of Documents, Interrogatories and Requests
27
28
for Admissions to Plaintiff; and
3.
Defendant’s Answers to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production and Interrogatories to
Plaintiff.
2
1
Defendant Ninyo & Moore, Geotechnical Consultants dba Ninyo & Moore
2
Geotechnical & Environment Sciences Consultants served Plaintiffs with the
3
following discovery to date:
4
1.
Defendant’s Initial NRCP 16.1 disclosures and Three (3) Supplements thereto;
5
2.
Defendant’s Requests for Production of Documents, Interrogatories and Requests
6
for Admissions to Plaintiff; and
7
3.
8
Defendant’s Answers to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production and Interrogatories to
Plaintiff.
9
II.
10
DEPOSITIONS TAKEN TO DATE
11
1.
Deposition of Michael Thompson taken on October 30, 2017;
12
2.
Deposition of Officer Shane R. Witham taken on November 21, 2017;
13
3.
Deposition of Naik Banavathu taken on January 23, 2018.
14
III.
15
DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED
16
1.
Deposition of Rathna Mothkuri scheduled for February 5, 2018;
17
2.
Deposition of Defendant’s NRCP 30(b)(6) witness(es);
18
3.
Depositions of the parties respective experts;
19
4.
Depositions of parties before and after witnesses; and
20
The Parties anticipate that they may need to conduct other forms of discovery, though not
21
specifically delineated herein, and anticipate doing so only on an as-needed basis.
22
IV.
23
REASONS DISCOVERY WAS NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS AND
24
NEEDS TO BE EXTENDED
25
Although the Parties have diligently been working on this matter there are still
26
depositions in this matter that need to be completed. Also, parties have agreed to mediate this
27
matter and we are working on scheduling the same. In addition, our expert, Patrick Altvater, had
28
an unexpected medical issue.
3
1
V.
2
CURRENT DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND TRIAL DATE
3
Last day to amend pleadings or add parties:
February 9, 2018;
4
Initial Expert Disclosure:
February 9, 2018;
5
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures:
March 12, 2018;
6
Discovery Cutoff:
April 10, 2018;
7
Dispositive Motions:
May 10, 2018; and
8
Trial:
TBD.
9
VI.
10
PROPOSED DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND TRIAL DATE
11
Last day to amend pleadings or add parties:
March 27, 2018;
12
Initial Expert Disclosure:
March 27, 2018;
13
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures:
April 26, 2018;
14
Discovery Cutoff:
June 25, 2018;
15
Dispositive Motions:
July 25, 2018; and
16
Trial:
TBD.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DATED this 2nd day of February, 2018.
EGLET PRINCE
/s/ Joseph Troiano
ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 3402
TRACY A. EGLET, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6419
JOSEPH J. TROIANO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12505
Attorneys for Plaintiff
26
27
28
4
1
DATED this 2nd day of February, 2018.
2
HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP.
3
4
/s/ Michael Hall
MICHAEL R. HALL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5978
7425 Peak Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89128
Attorney for Defendants
5
6
7
8
DATED this 2nd day of February, 2018.
9
CISNEROS & MARIAS
10
11
/s/ Jason Foulger
JASON C. FOULGER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7338
1160 North Town Center Dr., Suite 130
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Attorney for Defendants
12
13
14
15
ORDER
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED
18
February 6
DATED this _____ day of February, 2018.
19
_______
UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
EGLET PRINCE
/s/ Joseph Troiano
ROBERT T. EGLET, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 3402
TRACY A EGLET, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6419
JOSEPH J. TROIANO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12505
400 S. 7th Street, 4th Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?