U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 96

ORDER Vacating 95 Order Disbursing Security Bond. Federal registry shall disburse the $500.00 security bonds plus interest to Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Finance - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 7 8 9 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER v. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al., 10 11 Case No. 2:17-cv-01677-JCM-NJK Defendants. Presently before the court is the matter of U.S. Bank, National Association, et al. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al., case number 2:17-cv-01677-JCM-NJK. 13 On June 15, 2017, plaintiff U.S. Bank, National Association (“U.S. Bank”) initiated this 14 quiet title action against defendants SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Los Prados Community 15 Association. (ECF No. 1.) On July 12, 2017, the court ordered U.S. Bank to post security for 16 costs in the amount of $500.00 pursuant to NRS 18.130. (ECF No. 11.) The next day, U.S. 17 Bank, through Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP, deposited $500.00 with the court. (ECF No. 12.) 18 On April 2, 2019, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to dismiss with prejudice all 19 claims in this action. (ECF No. 93.) As this matter is now concluded, the court will disburse to 20 Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP the $500.00 security bond plus interest. 21 Accordingly, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court’s previous order disbursing the security bond 23 24 25 26 27 28 plus interest to U.S. Bank (ECF No. 95) be, and the same hereby is, VACATED. IT IS FURTHERE ORDERED that federal registry shall disburse the $500.00 security bonds plus interest to Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP. DATED THIS 15th day of April 2019. JAMES C. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?