U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
96
ORDER Vacating 95 Order Disbursing Security Bond. Federal registry shall disburse the $500.00 security bonds plus interest to Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Finance - JM)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER
v.
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al.,
10
11
Case No. 2:17-cv-01677-JCM-NJK
Defendants.
Presently before the court is the matter of U.S. Bank, National Association, et al. v. SFR
Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al., case number 2:17-cv-01677-JCM-NJK.
13
On June 15, 2017, plaintiff U.S. Bank, National Association (“U.S. Bank”) initiated this
14
quiet title action against defendants SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Los Prados Community
15
Association. (ECF No. 1.) On July 12, 2017, the court ordered U.S. Bank to post security for
16
costs in the amount of $500.00 pursuant to NRS 18.130. (ECF No. 11.) The next day, U.S.
17
Bank, through Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP, deposited $500.00 with the court. (ECF No. 12.)
18
On April 2, 2019, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to dismiss with prejudice all
19
claims in this action. (ECF No. 93.) As this matter is now concluded, the court will disburse to
20
Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP the $500.00 security bond plus interest.
21
Accordingly,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court’s previous order disbursing the security bond
23
24
25
26
27
28
plus interest to U.S. Bank (ECF No. 95) be, and the same hereby is, VACATED.
IT IS FURTHERE ORDERED that federal registry shall disburse the $500.00 security
bonds plus interest to Wright Finlay & Zak, LLP.
DATED THIS 15th day of April 2019.
JAMES C. MAHAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?