Chaplin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule. Motions due by 12/13/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:17-cv-01686-APG-NJK Document 22-1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Cyrus Safa
Attorney at Law: 13241
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562) 868-5886
Fax: (562) 868-5491
E-mail cyrus.safa@rohlfinglaw.com
Leonard Stone
Attorney at Law: 5791
Shook & Stone, Chtd.
710 South 4th Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Tel.: (702) 385-2220
Fax: (702) 384-0394
E-mail: LMoreno@shookandstone.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN H. CHAPLIN
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
16
17
JOHN H. CHAPLIN
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security.
20
21
22
Defendant.
) Case No.: 2:17-cv-01686-APG-NJK
)
) │PROPOSED│ ORDER EXTENDING
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
23
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for cause shown,
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time, to
25
26
and include December 13, 2017, in which to file Plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment and/or remand; and that all other deadlines set forth in the October 30,
-1-
Case 2:17-cv-01686-APG-NJK Document 22-1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 2 of 3
1
2017 Case Management Order shall be extended accordingly. IT IS SO
2
ORDERED.
3
Dated: November 30, 2017
DATE
4
_______________________________
THE HONORABLE NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Case 2:17-cv-01686-APG-NJK Document 22-1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 3 of 3
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing
3
4
5
6
/s/Cyrus Safa
BY: _________________________
Cyrus Safa
Attorney for plaintiff
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?