Crittendon v. Lombardo et al

Filing 335

ORDER Granting 334 Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/2/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Marquis Aurbach Nick D. Crosby, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8996 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 382-0711 Facsimile: (702) 382-5816 ncrosby@maclaw.com jnichols@maclaw.com Attorneys for Defendants, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Rogers, Sanchez, Torres, Brown, Patimeteeporn, Senior, Trost, Verduzco, Binko, Reynolds, Johnson, Williams, Sgt. Mark Hopkins, Officer Kaluna Aki, Officer Jamie Joiner, Officer Mecham and Officer Juan Sanchez 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 JOSHUA CRITTENDON, U Case Number: 2 :17-cv-01700-RFB-BNW 00 13 8 14 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE VS. cn :4 4 ,1 15 JOE LOMBARDO, et al., cycs>9 16 17 Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Joshua Crittendon 18 ("Plaintiff"), by and through his counsel of record, Diana Ebron, Esq., and Defendants, Las 19 Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Corey Rogers, Francisco Sanchez, Pablo Torres, 20 Aaron Brown, Kevin Patimeteeporn, Jared Senior, Nicholas Trost, Leonel Verduzco, Mark 21 Binko, Jesse Reynolds, Anthony Johnson, Jacob Williams, Sgt. Mark Hopkins, Officer 22 Kaluna Aki, Officer Jamie Joiner, Officer Mecham and Officer Juan Sanchez (collectively 23 "LVMPD Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, Nicholas Crosby, Esq. and 24 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq., with the law firm of Marquis Aurbach, (collectively the "Parties"), 25 that the parties agree as follows: 26 27 Page 1 of 3 MAC:I4687-077 5037025_1 5/30/2023 8:35 AM 1. 2 Any and all claims with respect to the above-captioned matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff Joshua Crittendon and LVMPD Defendants; and Each party will bear its own attorney fees and costs. 3 2. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 Dated this Dated this day of May, 2023 6 77 By: B : 9 10 11 y, 2023 MARQUIS 7 8 ay o na S. Ebron, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10580 1050 E. Flamingo Road, Suite 107 #1252 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Pro Bono Attorneyfor Plaintiff 12 13 14 15 Nick D. y, sq. Nevan a ar o. 8996 Jacki . Nichols, Esq. Neva. Bar No. 14246 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Defendants, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Rogers, Sanchez, Tones, Brown, Patimeteeporn, Senior, Trost, Verduzco, Binko, Reynolds, Johnson, Williams, Sgt. Mark Hopkins, Officer Kaluna Aki, Officer Jamie Joiner, Officer Mecham and Officer Juan Sanchez 16 ORDER 17 IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH 18 19 PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and 20 21 22 costs. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of June , 2023. 23 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 25 26 27 Page 2 of 3 MAC:I4687-077 5037025_1 5/30/2023 8:35 AM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing STIPULATION AND 3 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE with the Clerk of the Court for the a day of May, 4 United States District Court by using the court's CM/ECF system on the .2,15t 5 2023. 6 Eg I further certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users 7 and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. 8 E] I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered 9 CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, 10 or have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days 11 to the following non-CM/ECF participants: 12 U .rr 00 °> c"7; `2 • •Oi 8> 2P yv ~ .tt 13 `4 `" 14 An employee of Marquis Aurbach ce (4)4 'nu. g N/A 15 F: F.; 16 17 ` 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Page 3 of 3 MAC:14687-077 5037025_1 5/30/2023 8:35 AM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?