Moser v. Ballard et al

Filing 26

ORDER Rejecting 25 Second Joint Pretrial Order. Third Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/24/2022. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/8/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 CHARLES MOSER, 4 5 v. Case No. 2:17-cv-01704-APG-NJK Plaintiff, ORDER REJECTING SECOND PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER DEVIN BALLARD, PATRICK NEVILLE, LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE 6 DEPARTMENT, 7 [ECF No. 25] Defendants. 8 9 The parties have filed a second proposed joint pretrial order (ECF No. 25) that, like its 10 predecessor, violates Local Rule 16-3(b)(8). While the parties have now included their lists of 11 exhibits and objections, it appears the defendants have simply listed almost every document 12 produced in this case (except those marked LVMPD-Moser 000224-329). And the parties’ 13 objections are not tied to the specific exhibits as required by the Local Rules. Thus, it is 14 impossible to determine how to rule on those objections. I therefore reject the proposed order. 15 The requirements set forth in Local Rules 16-3 and 16-4 are designed to streamline trial 16 preparation and presentation, and to foster settlement. The parties cannot simply wait to make 17 trial decisions until the eve of trial. If they do, they cannot fully participate in settlement 18 discussions. The defendants are ordered to review their exhibits to determine whether all of 19 them are reasonably necessary at trial. Then, each side is to list its objections to the specific 20 exhibit being objected to. The parties shall submit a joint pretrial order that complies with the 21 Local Rules by March 24, 2022. The failure to do so may result in dismissal of claims and 22 defenses, and sanctions against parties and counsel. 23 DATED THIS 8th day of March, 2022. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?