Jackson v. Williams et al
ORDER : This action is dismissed for petitioner's failure to exhaust his available state-court remedies. The Clerk of the Court will enter judgment accordingly and close this action. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
ROBERT J. JACKSON,
Case No. 2:17-cv-01711-MMD-VCF
BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,
The Court directed petitioner to show cause why this action should not be
dismissed because it appeared that petitioner had not yet exhausted his state-court
remedies. Petitioner has not filed a response to the Court’s order within the allotted time.
A review of the Nevada Supreme Court’s on-line docket shows that petitioner’s direct
appeal still is pending. Jackson v. State, No. 71726.1 Consequently, the petition is
Reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s conclusion to be debatable or wrong,
and the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability.
It is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed for petitioner’s failure to exhaust
his available state-court remedies. The Clerk of the Court will enter judgment accordingly
and close this action.
It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied.
DATED THIS 6th day of December 2017.
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
generated December 4, 2017).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?