Bartell v. Clark County Collection Service LLC
Filing
22
ORDER Granting Defendant's 21 Motion for Stay. This case is STAYED. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
JENNIFER BARTELL,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CLARK COUNTY COLLECTION
)
SERVICE, LLC,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:17-cv-01714-RFB-GWF
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Stay (ECF No. 21), filed on
14
November 13, 2017. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to this motion and the time for
15
opposition has now expired.1
16
Defendant represents that on November 9, 2017, United States Bankruptcy Judge Mike K.
17
Nakagawa issued an order reopening Plaintiff’s bankruptcy so that she could amend her schedules to
18
include her instant claims against Defendant. Defendant asserts that a bankruptcy filing triggers an
19
automatic stay under Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code and therefore argues that this case should
20
be stayed. See 11 U.S.C.A § 362(a)(3). The Court agrees. Accordingly,
21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Stay (ECF No. 21) is granted.
22
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby STAYED.
23
DATED this 28th day of November, 2017.
24
25
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), “The failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any
motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for attorney’s fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the
motion.”
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?