Green v. TCB Las Vegas, LLC

Filing 46

ORDER denying 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER granting 27 Motion to Strike; ORDER denying 29 Motion to Extend Time; Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 DAVIE L. GREEN, 4 Plaintiff 5 v. 6 TCB LAS VEGAS, LLC, doing business as COUNT’S VAMP’D ROCK BAR & GRILL, 7 Defendant 8 9 Case No.: 2:17-cv-01717-APG-PAL Order (1) Granting Motion to Strike, (2) Denying Motion to Extend Time, and (3) Denying Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF Nos. 26, 27, 29] Plaintiff Davie Green filed suit against her former employer, defendant TCB Las Vegas, 10 LLC, doing business as Count’s Vamp’d Rock Bar & Grill. She asserts claims for sex 11 discrimination under federal and state law. ECF No. 1. TCB moves for summary judgment. ECF 12 No. 26. Green moves to strike the summary judgment motion as untimely. ECF No. 27. She 13 also opposes the motion on the merits and objects to some of TCB’s exhibits. ECF Nos. 37, 39. 14 TCB responds that its motion is timely but alternatively moves to extend the deadline to file it. 15 ECF No. 29. 16 I grant the motion to strike because TCB’s motion for summary judgment is untimely and 17 there is no good reason to extend the deadline. Magistrate Judge Leen held a hearing on January 18 16, 2018 on TCB’s motion to extend discovery. ECF No. 20. At that hearing, Judge Leen 19 granted TCB 45 days to complete discovery despite noting that TCB had not “shown excusable 20 neglect, diligence, or good cause for . . . basically starting from scratch after the expiration of the 21 discovery cutoff.” ECF No. 30 at 12. At the hearing, Judge Leen stated she granted “45 days 22 from today’s date to conduct whatever discovery you can do within that period of time.” Id. 23 Forty-five days from January 16 is March 2, 2018. The scheduling order provides that 1 dispositive motions were due 30 days after the discovery cut-off date. ECF No. 14. Thus, the 2 dispositive motion deadline was April 1, 2018, which was a Sunday, so the motion was due the 3 next business day, April 2, 2018. TCB filed its motion on April 6, 2018 without any explanation 4 as to why it was not timely filed. 5 I deny TCB’s later-filed motion to extend time. TCB attempts to justify its late filing by 6 arguing the parties understood the 45-day period ran from January 22, 2018, which is the date the 7 minutes of the January 16, 2018 hearing were entered on the docket. Judge Leen was clear at the 8 hearing, which defense counsel attended, that the 45 days ran from the date of the hearing. ECF 9 No. 30 at 12 (stating twice that the 45 days ran from “today’s date”). TCB has not shown good 10 cause for its failure to meet the dispositive motion deadline or excusable neglect for filing the 11 motion to extend time after the dispositive motion deadline expired. See LR 26-4. 12 While ordinarily I may excuse a few days’ tardiness, TCB’s prior conduct in this case 13 weighs against granting an extension. As Judge Leen discussed at the January 16 hearing, TCB 14 did not conduct any discovery during the first 90 days of the discovery period, did nothing other 15 than respond to Green’s discovery requests in the final 90 days of discovery, and filed an 16 untimely motion to extend discovery. ECF No. 30 at 3-4, 8-9. Despite the fact that TCB was not 17 diligent and had not shown good cause for extending the discovery deadline, Judge Leen 18 generously granted TCB’s late-filed motion and gave TCB 45 more days to conduct discovery. 19 Despite previously failing to exercise diligence, show good cause, or meet applicable deadlines, 20 TCB missed the summary judgment deadline, again with no good cause shown. Under these 21 circumstances, I deny the motion to extend time. Because the motion for summary judgment is 22 untimely, I deny it. 23 / / / / 2 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to strike (ECF No. 27) is 2 GRANTED, the defendant’s motion to extend time (ECF No. 29) is DENIED, and the 3 defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 26) is DENIED as untimely. 4 DATED this 21st day of December, 2018. 5 6 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?