Garcia v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC et al

Filing 84

ORDER Granting 83 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/23/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Download PDF
C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JACOB D. BUNDICK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9772 MICHAEL HOGUE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12400 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 N Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 792-3773 Facsimile: (702) 792-9002 Email: bundickj@gtlaw.com hoguem@gtlaw.com Counsel for Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Greenberg Traurig, LLP Suite 400 North, 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 (702) 792-3773 (702) 792-9002 (fax) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DISTRICT OF NEVADA TROY A. GARCIA, Case No.: 2:17-cv-01721-RFB-VCF Plaintiff, v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC; AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP.; TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES; WELLS FARGO CARD SERVICES; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER Defendants. 18 19 20 COME NOW, Plaintiff Troy A. Garcia (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Specialized Loan 21 Servicing, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record in the above- 22 captioned matter, and hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to LR 7-1, as follows: 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. On May 14, 2018, Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 35] (“Defendant’s Motion”). 2. On May 14, 2018, Plaintiff filed his Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF No. 37] (“Plaintiff’s Motion” and, collectively with Defendant’s Motion, the “Motions”). 3. After the parties completed briefing on the Motions, the Court conducted oral argument on September 21, 2018, and took the Motions under submission. ACTIVE 43062020v1 -1- 1 4. On March 21, 2019, the Court entered an order granting in part and denying in part 2 Defendant’s Motion, denying Plaintiff’s Motion, and directing the parties to submit a Joint Pretrial 3 Order by April 24, 2019 [ECF No. 67] 4 5 5. On April 16, 2019, Defendant filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s order [ECF No. 70]. 6 6. On May 4, 2019 Plaintiff to file his response to the Motion for Reconsideration. 7 7. On May 20, 2019 Defendant filed its reply in support of the Motion for 8 Reconsideration. 9 8. Greenberg Traurig, LLP Suite 400 North, 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 (702) 792-3773 (702) 792-9002 (fax) 10 has not been reached. 11 12 The Parties have engaged in some settlement conversations, although a settlement 9. Lead Counsel for Plaintiff will be on an extended vacation outside of the United States from July 3-12. Counsel for SLS has a heavy travel and trial schedule. 13 10. The parties have met and conferred via email on the pretrial deadline. SLS believes 14 that the issues raised in the Motion for Reconsideration, may substantially impact the issues to be 15 decided at trial, and to allow the Court an opportunity to consider the motion and any oral argument 16 heard, it is the best interests of the parties and judicial economy to continue the deadline to submit 17 a Joint Pretrial Order by thirty (30) days from July 23, 2019 to August 23, 2019. As noted in 18 Plaintiff’s opposition to SLS’s Motion for Reconsideration, Plaintiff believes that reconsideration 19 should be denied, such that adjudication on the motion will not limit the issues remaining for trial. 20 Regardless, Plaintiff has no objection to a brief extension of the pretrial deadlines due to the parties’ 21 prior commitments and briefing schedules. 22 extension is warranted. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// ACTIVE 43062020v1 Therefore, the parties are in agreement that an -2- 1 2 11. This stipulation is submitted in good faith and not for the purposes of delay. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 3 DATED this 28th day of June, 2019. DATED this 28th day of June, 2019. 4 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP KNEPPER & CLARK LLC /s/ Jacob D. Bundick JACOB D. BUNDICK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9772 MICHAEL HOGUE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12400 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 N Las Vegas, NV 89169 Counsel for Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC /s/ Miles N. Clark MATTHEW I. KNEPPER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12796 MILES N. CLARK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13848 5510 S. Fort Apache Road, Suite 30 Las Vegas, NV 89148 5 6 7 8 9 Greenberg Traurig, LLP Suite 400 North, 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 (702) 792-3773 (702) 792-9002 (fax) 10 11 DAVID H. KRIEGER, ESQ. HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC Nevada Bar No. 9086 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 Counsel for Plaintiff Troy A. Garcia 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Pretrial Order is due by August 23, 2019. 17 18 ________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7-1-2019 Dated: ________________ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ACTIVE 43062020v1 -3- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b), 45, I hereby certify that on June 28, 2019, a copy of the 3 foregoing SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT JOINT 4 PRETRIAL ORDER was filed electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Notice of filing will 5 be served on all parties by operation of the Court’s CM/ECF filing system, and parties may access 6 this filing through the Court’s CM/ECF system. 7 8 9 Greenberg Traurig, LLP Suite 400 North, 3773 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 (702) 792-3773 (702) 792-9002 (fax) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Troy A. Garcia Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Miles N. Clark, Esq. Knepper & Clark 5510 S. Fort Apache Road, Suite 30 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com Miles.clark@knepperclark.com David H. Krieger Haines & Krieger, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com 17 18 /s/ Megan L. Sheffield An employee of GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ACTIVE 43062020v1 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?