Douzat v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 28

ORDER that the Court incorporates the findings and analysis in the 25 report and recommendation into this order and GRANTS the 15 motion for reversal or remand. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the report and recommendation. The Clerk's Office is instructed to enter final Judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 MICHAEL K. DOUZAT, Case No.: 2:17-cv-01740-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 10 v. 11 ANDREW SAUL, 12 13 [Docket No. 15] Defendant(s). On January 7, 2020, the undersigned issued a report and recommendation that the motion 14 for reversal or remand be granted in that the case should be remanded for further proceedings. 15 Docket No. 25. The deadline for objecting to that report and recommendation expired on January 16 21, 2020. See Local Rule IB 3-2. No objection was filed. 17 Pursuant to the pilot program regarding magistrate judge consent in social security cases, 18 see General Order 2019-08, the parties have consented to the undersigned magistrate judge’s 19 handling of this case, see Docket No. 27; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(a); 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). 20 Accordingly, the Court hereby incorporates the findings and analysis in the report and 21 recommendation into this order and GRANTS the motion for reversal or remand (Docket No. 15) 22 for the reasons stated therein. The case is hereby remanded for further proceedings consistent with 23 the report and recommendation. The Clerk’s Office is instructed to ENTER FINAL 24 JUDGMENT accordingly and to CLOSE this case. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED 26 Dated: January 22, 2020 27 ______________________________ Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?