Composite Resources Inc v. Recon Medical LLC
Filing
140
ORDER that Defendant's motion for clarification (ECF No. 125 ) is granted. The term "body part" is not a limitation as used throughout the asserted claims. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
COMPOSITE RESOURCES, INC.,
Case No. 2:17-cv-01755-MMD-VCF
Plaintiff,
7
v.
ORDER
8
RECON MEDICAL, LLC,
9
Defendant.
10
11
Before the Court is Defendant Recon Medical, LLC’s motion for clarification.1
12
(ECF No. 125.) The Court grants the motion, and clarifies that the term “body part” is
13
not a limitation as used throughout the asserted claims. (See ECF No. 69 at 4 (making
14
this argument).) To be clear, the term “body part” is not a limitation or element of the
15
asserted claims, both as used in the preambles of the asserted patents and throughout
16
the asserted claims.
17
It is therefore ordered that Defendant’s motion for clarification (ECF No. 125) is
18
granted. The term “body part” is not a limitation as used throughout the asserted claims.
19
20
DATED THIS 19th day of November 2018.
21
22
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
The Court also reviewed Plaintiff Composite Resources, Inc.’s response (ECF
No. 133). Defendant did not file a reply.
1
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?