Federal National Mortgage Association v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 6671 W. Tropicana 103 et al

Filing 57

ORDER Granting 55 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 51 , 52 Motions for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 3/11/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Matthew S. Carter, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9524 Christina V. Miller, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12448 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 (702) 475-7964; Fax: (702) 946-1345 cmiller@wrightlegal.net Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 Case No.: 2:17-cv-01758-RFB-GWH vs. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 6671 W. TROPICANA 103; CASA MESA VILLAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPETING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 51 AND 52] [FIRST REQUEST] Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), by and through its 18 attorneys of record. and Defendant, Saticoy Bay LLC Series 6671 W. Tropicana 103 (“Saticoy 19 Bay”), by and through its attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 20 WHEREAS, on September 28, 2018, this Court stayed the above-referenced case 21 pending decision from the Nevada Supreme Court regarding the state recording laws in SFR 22 Inv.’s Pool 1, LLC v. Green Tree Serv., LLC, Case No. 72010 (Nev. Submitted for Decision 23 Sept. 13, 2018), and Onewest Bank FSB v. Holm Int’l Prop.’s, LLC, Case No. 72933 (Nev. 24 Submitted for Decision Sept. 13, 2018). ECF No. 43. 25 WHEREAS, on December 17, 2018, the Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the judgment 26 of the district court in SFR Inv.’s Pool 1, LLC v. Green Tree Serv., LLC, and on December 20, 27 2018, the Nevada Supreme Court reversed and remanded the judgment of the district court in 28 Onewest Bank FSB v. Holm Int’l Prop.’s, LLC. Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, on January 10, 2019, the parties filed a Stipulation to lift the stay of litigation and to set the deadline to file dispositive motions. ECF No. 44. WHEREAS, thereafter, on January 31, 2019, Saticoy Bay filed its Motion to Certify Questions to the Nevada Supreme Court. ECF No. 46. WHEREAS, on February 11, 2019, Fannie Mae and Saticoy Bay filed competing Motions for Summary Judgment. ECF Nos. 51 and 52, respectively. WHEREAS, the current deadline to file a response to the competing dispositive motions (ECF Nos. 51 and 52) is currently set for March 4, 2019. WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, 10 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the parties request a brief extension 11 of the deadline to respond to the competing dispositive motions in light of the Motion to Certify 12 and extensive legal arguments and issues raised by the competing dispositive motions. The 13 Parties seek a brief extension of the deadline to respond to the competing dispositive motions 14 from March 4, 2019, to March 11, 2019. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 17 DATED this 4th day of March, 2019. DATED this 4th day of March, 2019. WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Law Office of Michael F. Bohn, Esq., Ltd. /s/ Christina V. Miller, Esq. Matthew S. Carter, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9524 Christina V. Miller, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12448 Attorney for Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association /s/ Michael F. Bohn, Esq. Michael F. Bohn, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 1641 Adam R. Trippiedi, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12294 Attorneys for Defendant, Saticoy Bay LLC Series 6671 W. Tropicana 103 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. ________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: ________________________ DATED this 5th day COURT JUDGE U.S. DISTRICT of March, 2019. Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?