Ditech Financal LLC v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 47

ORDER granting 46 Stipulation; Re: 45 Motion to Dismiss, Responses due by 9/20/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 0050
Regina A. Habermas, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8481
7785 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
[phone]; Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Ditech Financial LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC,

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01772-RFB-PAL

Plaintiff,

11
12

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE
RESPONSE

vs.

13
14
15
16

(FIRST REQUEST)
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company; DESERT GREENS
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a Nevada
non-profit cooperative corporation,

17

Defendants.

18
Plaintiff, Ditech Financial LLC (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, SFR Investments Pool 1,

19
20

LLC (“SFR”)1, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

21

On July 13, 2018, the Court entered its Order staying the above-captioned case and

22

denying all pending motions without prejudice [ECF No. 44]. On August 23, 2018, SFR filed its

23

Renewed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) and

24

12(b)(7) (the “Renewed Motion”) [ECF No. 45]. Pursuant to the Court’s July 13, 2018 Order,

25

the deadline for Ditech to respond to the Renewed Motion is September 13, 2018 [ECF No. 44].

26

SFR’s Renewed Motion raises complex issues and counsel requires additional time to complete a

27
28

1

Plaintiff and SFR are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties.”

Page 1 of 2

1

response. For these reasons, the Parties are in agreement to extend the deadline for Ditech to

2

respond to SFR’s Renewed Motion by one week. This is the Parties’ first request to extend the

3

subject deadline and the request is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay or prejudice

4

to any other party.

5

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the

6

deadline for Ditech to respond to SFR’s Renewed Motion shall be extended to September 20,

7

2018.

8
9
10

DATED this 11th day of September, 2018.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP

DATED this 11th day of September, 2018.
KIM GILBERT EBRON

/s/ Regina A. Habermas, Esq.
Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 0050
Regina A. Habermas, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8481
7785 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Ditech Financial LLC

/s/ Diana S. Ebron, Esq.
Diana S. Ebron, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10580
Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10593
Karen L. Hanks, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9578
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, NV 89139
Attorneys for Defendant, SFR Investments
Pool 1, LLC

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
ORDER

20
21
22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED:
13th
September
DATED this ______ day of _________________, 2018.

__________________________

___________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States District Court

25
26
27
28

Page 2 of 2