Ditech Financal LLC v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 59

ORDER granting 57 Stipulation; Re: 53 Motion, 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 11/28/2018. Replies due by 12/19/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 0050
Regina A. Habermas, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8481
7785 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
[phone]; Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Ditech Financial LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC,

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01772-RFB-PAL

Plaintiff,

11
12

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES

vs.
(FIRST REQUEST)

13
14
15
16

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company; DESERT GREENS
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a Nevada
non-profit cooperative corporation,

17

Defendants.

18
19

Plaintiff, Ditech Financial LLC (“Ditech”), and Defendant, Desert Greens Homeowners’

20

Association (“HOA”)1, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as

21

follows:

22

On October 24, 2018, the HOA filed a Renewed Motion to Dismiss Complaint [ECF

23

No. 53] and Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54] (collectively, the

24

“Renewed Motions”). The deadline for Ditech to respond to the HOA’s Renewed Motion to

25

Dismiss Complaint is November 7, 2018. The deadline for Ditech to respond to the HOA’s

26

Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is November 14, 2018. The Renewed Motions raise

27
28

1

Ditch and the HOA are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties.”

Page 1 of 2

1

complex issues and counsel requires additional time complete the responses. In addition, the

2

Parties are discussing a possible resolution of Ditech’s claims against the HOA, which would

3

eliminate the need for further briefing on the Renewed Motions. For these reasons, the Parties

4

are in agreement to extend the deadline for Ditech to respond to the Renewed Motions and

5

extend the time for the HOA to file replies in support of the Renewed Motions. This is the

6

Parties’ first request to extend the subject deadlines and the request is made in good faith and

7

not for purposes of delay or prejudice to any other party.

8

Based on the foregoing,

9

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline for Ditech to respond

10
11
12

to the HOA’s Renewed Motions shall be extended to November 28, 2018.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline for the HOA to file
any replies in support of the Renewed Motions shall be extended to December 19, 2018.

13
14

DATED this 6th day of November, 2018.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP

DATED this 6th day of November, 2018.
LEACH KERN GRUCHOW ANDERSON
SONG

/s/ Regina A. Habermas, Esq.
Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 0050
Regina A. Habermas, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8481
7785 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Ditech Financial LLC

/s/ Ryan W. Reed, Esq.
Sean L. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 7259
Ryan W. Reed, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11695
2525 Box Canyon Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89128
Attorneys for Defendant, Desert Greens
Homeowners’ Association

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER

23
24
25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED:

7th
November
DATED this ______ day of _________________, 2018.
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28

Page 2 of 2