Prof-2013-S3 Legal Title Trust v. Desert Rain Holdings, LLC
Filing
12
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED defendant shall file its certificate of interested parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 11/13/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST,
8
9
10
Case No. 2:17-cv-01793-APG-PAL
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
DESERT RAIN HOLDINGS, LLC,
Defendant.
11
12
This matter is before the court on defendant’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested
13
Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed June 29,
14
2017. Defendant filed an Answer (ECF No. 8) August 19, 2017. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless
15
otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) counsel for private parties shall,
16
upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons,
17
associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which
18
have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there
19
are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect
20
must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental
21
certification upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To date, defendant has
22
failed to comply. Accordingly,
23
IT IS ORDERED defendant shall file its certificate of interested parties, which fully
24
complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than November 13, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the
25
issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
26
DATED this 30th day of October, 2017.
27
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?