Federal National Mortgage Association v. Vegas Property Services, Inc. et al
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED plaintiff shall file its certificate of interested parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 10/6/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
Case No. 2:17-cv-01798-APG-PAL
VEGAS PROPERTY SERVICES, INC., et al.,
This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested
Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed June 29,
2017. Defendant Vegas Property Services Inc. filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 7) August 18,
2017. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases)
counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required
by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations
(including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case.
LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties other than those participating
in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to
promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule
requires. To date, plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED plaintiff shall file its certificate of interested parties, which fully
complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than October 6, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the
issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
DATED this 22nd day of September, 2017.
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?