Klug v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Stipulation to Extend Deadline. Motions due by 9/3/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:17-cv-01801-JAD-GWF Document 15-1 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
Cyrus Safa
Attorney at Law: 13241
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562) 868-5886
Fax: (562) 868-5491
E-mail cyrus.safa@rohlfinglaw.com
5
6
7
8
Gerald M. Welt
Attorney at Law: 1575
732 S. Sixth Street, Suite 200-D
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Tel.: (702) 382-2030
Fax: (702) 684-5157
E-mail: gmwesq@weltlaw.com; kwp@weltlaw.com
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GARY J. KLUG
11
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
16
GARY J. KLUG
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
19
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
20
Defendant.
21
) Case No.: 2:17-cv-01801-JAD-GWF
)
) │PROPOSED│ ORDER EXTENDING
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
22
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for cause shown,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time, to
24
and include September 3, 2018, in which to file Plaintiff’s motion for reversal
25
///
26
27
28
-1-
Case 2:17-cv-01801-JAD-GWF Document 15-1 Filed 08/16/18 Page 2 of 3
1
and/or remand; and that all other deadlines set forth in the July 6, 2018 Case
2
Management Order shall be extended accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
DATE August 17, 2018.
4
_______________________________
THE HONORABLE GEORGE FOLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case 2:17-cv-01801-JAD-GWF Document 15-1 Filed 08/16/18 Page 3 of 3
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing
3
/s/Cyrus Safa
4
5
BY: _________________________
Cyrus Safa
Attorney for plaintiff
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?