Klug v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 28

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 27 the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT 17 plaintiff's motion for reversal or remand is DENIED and 20 the Commissioner's cross-motion to aff irm is GRANTED. The decision below is AFFIRMED, and with good cause appearing and no reason to delay, the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4 Gary J. Klug,
5

Case No. 2:17-cv-01801-JAD-EJY

Plaintiff
v.

6
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of
7 Social Security,
8

Defendant

Order Adopting Report and
Recommendation, Denying Motion
for Remand, and Granting
Cross-Motion to Affirm
[ECF Nos. 17, 20, 27]

9
Gary J. Klug brings this action to review the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of

10

11 his application for disability-insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Having
12 thoughtfully considered Klug’s motion to remand and the Commissioner’s cross-motion to
13 affirm in a 31-page report and recommendation, Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah
14 recommends that I deny Klug’s motion to remand and grant the Commissioner’s cross-motion. 1
15 The deadline for objections to that recommendation was yesterday, and no party has filed an
16 objection to it or moved to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate
17 judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” 2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation

18

19 [ECF No. 27] is ADOPTED in full;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT plaintiff’s motion for reversal or remand [ECF No.

20

21 17] is DENIED and the Commissioner’s cross-motion to affirm [ECF No. 20] is GRANTED.
22
1

23

2

ECF No. 27.

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

1 The decision below is AFFIRMED, and with good cause appearing and no reason to delay, the
2 Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER FINAL JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS
3 CASE.
4

Dated: November 19, 2019

5

_________________________________
_________________
_ _____ _ _
___
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
t Judge Jennifer A. D
udg
f

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

2