Ditech Financal LLC et al v. Lockmor Holdings, LLC

Filing 18

ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First request) re 14 MOTION to Dismiss and 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses to 14 Motion due by 9/29/2017. Replies to 15 Motion due by 10/6/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Case 2:17-cv-01829-JAD-PAL Document 17 Filed 09/13/17 Page 1 of 4

1
2
3
4

COLT B. DODRILL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9000
WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
6757 Spencer St.
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC and
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11
12

DITECH FINANCIAL LLC; FEDERAL
NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a
government-sponsored entity,

15
16
17

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS

Plaintiffs,

13
14

CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-01829-JAD-PAL

v.

(FIRST REQUEST)

LOCKMOR HOLDINGS, LLC.; DOES 1
through 10, inclusive; ROES Business Entities 1
through 10, inclusive; and all others who claim
interest in the subject property located at 520
Arrowhead Trail, #1122, Henderson, NV 89015 .
Defendants.

18
19

Pursuant to LR 6-1(b), DITECH FINANCIAL LLC (formerly known as Green Tree

20
21

Servicing LLC (hereinafter “Ditech”), FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION

22

(hereinafter “Fannie Mae”) and Lockmor Holdings, LLC (hereinafter after to as “Lockmor”) by and

23

through their attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

24

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2017, Defendant Lockmor moved to dismiss. ECF No. 14.

25

WHEREAS, Fannie Mae and Ditech’s response to the Motion to Dismiss is due September

26

15, 2017.

27

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2017, Ditech moved for summary judgment. ECF No. 15.

28

WHEREAS, Lockmor’s response to the Motion for Summary Judgment is due on September
1
2841084.1

Case 2:17-cv-01829-JAD-PAL Document 17 Filed 09/13/17 Page 2 of 4

1

22, 2017.

2

WHEREAS the parties wish to extend the deadlines.

3

Good cause exists to extend the response deadlines based on the volume of cases raising

4

similar issues handled by counsel for Ditech and Fannie Mae. An extension for Ditech and Fannie

5

Mae to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss will allow Ditech and Fannie Mae the opportunity

6

to more properly address the myriad of substantive issues raised in the Motion to Dismiss, including,

7

inter alia, the Federal Foreclosure Bar and the constitutionality of NRS 116.3116, et al. An

8

extension for Lockmor to respond to Ditech’s Motion for Summary Judgment will allow it the

9

opportunity to more properly address the various issues concerning the constitutionality of NRS

10

116.3116, et al.

11

Therefore, the parties stipulate and agree as follows:

12

THAT Ditech and Fannie Mae shall be granted an extension to September 29, 2017 to file

13

their Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14).

14

THAT Lockmor shall be granted an extension to October 6, 2017 to file its Response to

15

Ditech’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 15).

16

///

17

///

18

///

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
2
2841084.1

Case 2:17-cv-01829-JAD-PAL Document 17 Filed 09/13/17 Page 3 of 4

1

THAT this stipulated extension is not submitted for any improper purpose or delay.

2

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

3
4

DATED: September 13, 2017

WOLFE & WYMAN LLP

5
By: /s/ Colt B. Dodrill
COLT B. DODRILL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9000
6757 Spencer St.
Las Vegas, NV 89119

6
7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC and FEDERAL
NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION

9
10
11
12

DATED: September 13, 2017

MCCOY LAW GROUP, Ltd.

13
By: /s/ Brandon McCoy

14

BRANDON MCCOY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10402
625 S. 8th St., 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101

15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
LOCKMOR HOLDINGS, LLC

17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21
22

__________________________________
DATED: ___________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: September 13, 2017.

23
24

__________________________________________

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
3
2841084.1