Ditech Financal LLC et al v. Lockmor Holdings, LLC

Filing 25

ORDER Granting 24 Stipulation for Extension of Time (Second Request) re 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 10/13/2017. Replies due by 11/3/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/11/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-01829-JAD-PAL Document 24 Filed 10/11/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 SAO BRANDON W. MCCOY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 10402 MCCOY LAW GROUP, Ltd. 625 S. 8th Street, 2nd Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 384-2600 Telephone (702) 384-2603 Facsimile bmccoy@mccoylawgroup.com Attorney for Defendant, LOCKMOR HOLDINGS, LLC 7 DISTRICT COURT FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 8 9 10 MCCOY LAW GROUP, Ltd. 625 S. 8 Street, 2 Floor th nd Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 384-2600 Fax (702) 384-2603 11 12 13 14 DITECH FINANCIAL LLC; FEDERAL, ) NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) LOCKMOR HOLDINGS, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ ) 15 16 WHEREAS, On September 1, 2017 Defendant Lockmor moved to dismiss. ECF No. 14 WHEREAS, Ditech’s response to the Motion to Dismiss is due September 15, 2017. 19 WHEREAS, on September 1, 2017, Ditech moved for Summary Judgment. ECF No.15. 20 WHEREAS, Lockmor’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement is due on October 6, 2017. ECF No. 18. 22 24 25 26 27 28 (SECOND REQUEST) through their attorney of record, and hereby stipulate as follows: 18 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMES NOW, Defendant, by and through his attorney of record, and Plaintiff, by and 17 21 Case No.: 2:17CV-01829-JAD-PAL WHEREAS, Lockmor’s Reply to Ditech’s Response to Motion for to Dismiss is due on September 29, 2017. ECF. No 18. /// /// /// /// Case 2:17-cv-01829-JAD-PAL Document 24 Filed 10/11/17 Page 2 of 2 1 2 WHEREAS, Ditech’s Reply to Defendant’s Response for Motion for Summary Judgement is due on October 13, 2017. 3 WHEREAS, the parties agree to extend deadlines. 4 Good cause exists to extend the deadlines because attorney for Defendant had a family 5 emergency. 6 Therefore the parties stipulate and agree as follows: 7 THAT Lockmor shall be granted an extension to Friday October 13, 2017 to file its 8 9 10 Opposition for Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement. THAT Ditech shall be granted an extension to Friday November 3, 2017 to file its Reply to Defendant’s Opposition for Motion For Summary Judgement. 11 THAT this stipulated extension is not submitted for any improper purpose or delay. 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 14 15 DATED this ___ day of October, 2017. DATED this ___ day of October, 2017. 16 MCCOY LAW GROUP, Ltd. WOLFE & WYMAN, LLP __/s/ Brandon McCoy_______ BRANDON W. MCCOY, Esq. Nevada Bar No.: 10402 625 S. 8th Street, 2nd Floor Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 384-2600 Telephone (702) 384-2603 Facsimile Attorney for Defendant ____/s/ Colt Dodrill_____ COLT B. DODRILL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 9000 6757 Spencer St. Las Vegas, NV 89119 Attorney for Plaintiff 17 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 10/11/2017 DATED: _____________________ 24 25 __________________________________ UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?