U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
20
ORDER Granting Defendant's #14 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs and Granting Plaintiff's #19 Motion for Bond. Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association shall post a cost bond with the Court in the amount of $500 or make a cash deposit of $500 as to Defendant within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
U.S. Bank National Association, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________________ )
10
Case No. 2:17-cv-01899-RFB-CWH
ORDER
Presently before the court is Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s motion for demand
11
for security costs (ECF No. 14), filed on August 22, 2017. No response has been filed. Also before
12
the Court is Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association’s motion for bond (ECF No. 19), filed on
13
September 21, 2017. No response has been filed.
14
Defendant moves, pursuant to Nev. Rev. Stat. 18.130(1), to require Plaintiff to post a $500
15
security with the Court before any other action is taken in this case. Plaintiff disputes the
16
applicability of Nev. Rev. Stat. 18.130(1) in this case, but nonetheless moves the Court to order such
17
a bond.
18
19
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s motion (ECF No. 14) for demand for
security costs is GRANTED.
20
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for bond (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED.
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association shall post a cost
22
bond with the Court in the amount of $500, or make a cash deposit of $500 as to Defendant within
23
thirty days of this order.
24
DATED: December 14, 2017
25
26
27
28
_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?