U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 20

ORDER Granting Defendant's 14 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs and Granting Plaintiff's 19 Motion for Bond. Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association shall post a cost bond with the Court in the amount of $500 or make a cash deposit of $500 as to Defendant within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 U.S. Bank National Association, et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) _______________________________________ ) 10 Case No. 2:17-cv-01899-RFB-CWH ORDER Presently before the court is Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s motion for demand 11 for security costs (ECF No. 14), filed on August 22, 2017. No response has been filed. Also before 12 the Court is Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association’s motion for bond (ECF No. 19), filed on 13 September 21, 2017. No response has been filed. 14 Defendant moves, pursuant to Nev. Rev. Stat. 18.130(1), to require Plaintiff to post a $500 15 security with the Court before any other action is taken in this case. Plaintiff disputes the 16 applicability of Nev. Rev. Stat. 18.130(1) in this case, but nonetheless moves the Court to order such 17 a bond. 18 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s motion (ECF No. 14) for demand for security costs is GRANTED. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for bond (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association shall post a cost 22 bond with the Court in the amount of $500, or make a cash deposit of $500 as to Defendant within 23 thirty days of this order. 24 DATED: December 14, 2017 25 26 27 28 _________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?