U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al

Filing 97

AMENDED ORDER that the $500 deposit be refunded in accordance with the 21 Certificate of Cash Deposit to U.S. Bank National Association c/o Snell &Wilmer, LLP unless a party objects to this order by no later than 10 days. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 9 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECRUITIES CORP., CSMC MORTGAGE-BACKED PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-7, 10 11 12 13 14 Case No. 2:17-cv-01899-RFB-CWH AMENDED ORDER Plaintiff, v. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, ALESSI & KOENIG, LLC Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association opened this case by filing a complaint on July 11, 2017. Plaintiff filed a certificate of cash deposit of $500 pursuant to NRS 18.130(1) on January 12, 2018. ECF No.21. The Court granted the parties’ stipulation to dismiss the case with prejudice on April 25, 2019. ECF No. 95, (Order Granting Dismissal). However, the order did not address the certificate of cash deposit, noticing the Court of Plaintiff’s deposit of $500 in relation to the security cost bond required under NRS 18.130(1). The Court now corrects its Order to include instructions regarding the $500 deposit. 1 2 IT IS ORDERED that the $500 deposit be refunded in accordance with the certificate of cash deposit, ECF No. 21, to: 3 U.S. Bank National Association c/o Snell &Wilmer, LLP 4 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 5 Las Vegas, NV 89169 6 7 unless a party objects to this order by no later than 10 days. DATED: August 20, 2019. 8 __________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?