Middleton v. LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.

Filing 67

USCA ORDER denying 65 Petition for Writ of Mandamus. JM

Case: 18-70477, 02/27/2018, ID: 10780053, DktEntry: 3, Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILED
FEB 27 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

In re: ERVIN MIDDLETON, Jr.
______________________________
ERVIN MIDDLETON, Jr.,
Petitioner,
v.

No.

18-70477

D.C. No.
2:17-cv-01911-JCM-CWH
District of Nevada,
Las Vegas
ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS
VEGAS,
Respondent,
LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS INC.; et
al.,
Real Parties in Interest.
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of
this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v.
U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.
No further filings will be entertained in this closed case.
DENIED.

FG/MOATT