Carloni v. McDougal
ORDER denying 20 Motion for Judgment. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
[ECF No. 20]
On September 27, 2017, plaintiff Adam Carloni filed a document entitled “Enforcement
of Evidence to Motion for Judgement on One Subject-Matter.”1 The document was docketed as
a motion for judgment, but it does not appear to seek any relief from the court. Accordingly, to
the extent that the “Enforcement of Evidence to Motion for Judgement on One Subject-Matter” is
intended as a motion [ECF No. 20], IT IS DENIED. Plaintiff Carloni is cautioned that any
request for relief must be styled as a motion that clearly describes the action that the movant
desires the court to take. To the extent that this document was intended instead as a supplement
to the plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss,2 he is advised that he has already filed an
opposition,3 and supplemental oppositions are not permitted without leave of court. See Local
Rule 7-2(g) (“Supplementation prohibited without leave of court. A party may not file
supplemental pleadings, briefs, authorities, or evidence without leave of court granted for good
cause. The judge may strike supplemental filings made without leave of court.”).
DATED: October 10, 2017.
_ __ _ _ __
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
t Judge Jennifer A
ECF No. 20.
ECF No. 3.
ECF No. 9.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?