Carloni v. McDougal

Filing 25

ORDER denying 20 Motion for Judgment. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
2:17-cv-01917-JAD-GWF

4

Adam Carloni,

5

Plaintiff

Order
[ECF No. 20]

6

v.

7

Shane McDougal,

8

Defendant

9
10

On September 27, 2017, plaintiff Adam Carloni filed a document entitled “Enforcement

11

of Evidence to Motion for Judgement on One Subject-Matter.”1 The document was docketed as

12

a motion for judgment, but it does not appear to seek any relief from the court. Accordingly, to

13

the extent that the “Enforcement of Evidence to Motion for Judgement on One Subject-Matter” is

14

intended as a motion [ECF No. 20], IT IS DENIED. Plaintiff Carloni is cautioned that any

15

request for relief must be styled as a motion that clearly describes the action that the movant

16

desires the court to take. To the extent that this document was intended instead as a supplement

17

to the plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss,2 he is advised that he has already filed an

18

opposition,3 and supplemental oppositions are not permitted without leave of court. See Local

19

Rule 7-2(g) (“Supplementation prohibited without leave of court. A party may not file

20

supplemental pleadings, briefs, authorities, or evidence without leave of court granted for good

21

cause. The judge may strike supplemental filings made without leave of court.”).

22

DATED: October 10, 2017.

23

_______________________________
_______________
_ __ _ _ __
__
__
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
t Judge Jennifer A
udg
f

24
25
1

ECF No. 20.

2

ECF No. 3.

3

ECF No. 9.

26
27
28